<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title> HD 6850 with 1120 shaders went to reviewers</title>
		<description>Discuss  HD 6850 with 1120 shaders went to reviewers</description>
		<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 13:48:06 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/20604/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>stratege says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6919</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Non-Stop hum NO but your right that it might have been mentionned which I found funny It's a marketing image question like any ATI drivers problem = Ati drivers are never good]]></description>
			<dc:creator>stratege</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:09:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6919</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bobington says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6912</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You're right, AMD does lie a lot but that doesn't mean we shouldn't give them the benefit of the doubt. This was a simple mistake to make.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bobington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:10:15 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6912</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6910</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I guess that's what you get for lying and deceiving all the time. people stop giving you the benefit of the doubt.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:21:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6910</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Jaberwocky says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6906</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Tried one in a vice.Nope sorry it broke.... :D]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Jaberwocky</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:04:59 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6906</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Tom Kamkari says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6904</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anybody know if this made it fold better? ------- Tom Kamkari: http://tomkamkari.blogspot.com/]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Tom Kamkari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 06:31:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6904</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bobington says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6891</link>
			<description><![CDATA[If Nvidia had done this, you'd be hearing non-stop conspiracy theories.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bobington</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 16:57:02 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6891</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>canerpense says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6870</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Didn't AMD change the shader numbers before? Maybe they are not fused or laser-cut but just disabled by BIOS, just like the first batch of GTX465's were. We will soon see the odds. ;-) -- Why the f*ck did I get a negative for this? You don't want your 6850 unlocked? THAT'S OK FOR ME, LOSER.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>canerpense</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Oct 2010 06:09:21 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6870</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Nerdmaster says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6840</link>
			<description><![CDATA[These are sad news :sad:]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Nerdmaster</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:27:37 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6840</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>MrScary says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6832</link>
			<description><![CDATA[They come fused so is imposible so unlock them, see techpowerups reviews's coments]]></description>
			<dc:creator>MrScary</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:38:47 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6832</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6829</link>
			<description><![CDATA[it should work with all current 6850s on sale, although I wouldn't advise it when a newer batch of 6850s are released for the same reason they tell you not to put non rechargeable batteries in a battery charger (i.e. it might not work and you've then got a dead card) I dunno why people are rating this down, it's known to happen due to changes in the card design later in production such as stuff like the memory manufacturer or a slight core revision]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:02:36 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/20604-hd-6850-with-1120-shaders-went-to-reviewers#comment-6829</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
