<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>AMD's 28nm graphics is only a die shrink</title>
		<description>Discuss AMD's 28nm graphics is only a die shrink</description>
		<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 08:44:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/22373/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>Bo_Fox says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20723</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Actually, the article seems to be correct in this respect because my research findings strongly suggest that the Barts architecture is VLIW4 just like with Cayman. Both chips are of the Northern Islands family. If you look at the performance of the 6870 compared against the 5870 with 43% more shaders, you'd wonder. Better yet, just look at the 6790 vs. 5830 - nearly all of the specs are identical, but the 5830 has 40% more shaders. How can the 6790 be only 3% slower than the 5830 overall? http://alienbabeltech.com/abt/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=22733]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Bo_Fox</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:14:35 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20723</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dieterD says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20707</link>
			<description><![CDATA[I dot think, that GPU preformance will be a issue for gamers in future, BUT the new games will, because games are aimed for consoles (jea - those things with GPUs in 2006. year level). new crysis, COD goes on max with HD 6850, and developers dont even wana hear about PC gaming any more :(, so HD 7850 with zero preforamnce increase wont make difference for gamers, cuz newest games still would go on max anyray. other thing is mobile GPUs - there is room and sense for improvements...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dieterD</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:37:48 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20707</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>deadspeedv says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20701</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Another big advantage of staying with the same architecture is that the drivers will be very mature. They do not need to completely rewrite the drivers again. So we can expect a bugless launch.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>deadspeedv</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 02:17:52 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20701</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>dan says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20677</link>
			<description><![CDATA[First of all, if Fuad had bothered to read anything Charie has written at SemiAccurate, he would've known all of this months and months and months ago. Secondly: Nshittia are DOA at 28nm,]]></description>
			<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:21:25 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20677</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Joonas says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20656</link>
			<description><![CDATA[HD 7770 :eek: I'm hoping for a Diablo 3 christmas bundle!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Joonas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:11:42 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20656</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20626</link>
			<description><![CDATA[well Nvidia kepler will be a new architecture ;-)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:13:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20626</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20625</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Wrong nobody claimed 3 time the performance. Nvidia said 3-4 time performance/watt]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:11:00 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20625</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>spede says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20624</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Fuad has a gift taking positive news (from AMD) and turning them into negative news.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>spede</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:34:40 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20624</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>yourma2000 says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20619</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well if my maths is right, with the 28nm fab process we can get just over double the amount of transistors in a single die compared to the 40nm process, so with this transistor shrink will come partially less power hungry DX11 GPUs (unlike the HD 6000 & GTX500 series) and possibly a two fold+ increase in performance if the GPU manufacturers want to keep pushing their silicon regardless of power consumption. I imagine these HD 7000 series chips are when we can get a hold of DX11 around the throat in titles such as Metro 2033, as we'll now have faster GPUs with perfectly scaled transistor/SP ratios for DX11 performance and are using less power than the previous series.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>yourma2000</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 03:18:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20619</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The_Countess says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20614</link>
			<description><![CDATA[the difference is even bigger if you take die surface into account 55x55 = 3025 40x40 = 1600 (47% smaller then 55nm) 28x28 = 784 (51% smaller then 40nm)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>The_Countess</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:45:44 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/22373-amds-28nm-graphics-is-only-a-die-shrink#comment-20614</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
