<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>New Atoms will be faster than Phenom II</title>
		<description>Discuss New Atoms will be faster than Phenom II</description>
		<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 03:59:16 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="http://www.fudzilla.com/component/jcomments/feed/com_k2/23560/10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>evolucion8 says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27802</link>
			<description><![CDATA[You mean for another gay living in his basement. Don't you see that Dracqueen, Gayrrior, ass_fist, Gayrassic and Retardenck are all in nVidia's Gay Club shit? I've never seen an nVidia fan like those posting at least once without incurring in gay slurs or gay related words. Everything that comes from them is gay related, I don't get it, what's the point? What does gays have to do with graphic chips? sheesh, I now understand why they chose nVidia's Neon Green.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>evolucion8</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 16:26:29 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27802</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>JEskandari says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27769</link>
			<description><![CDATA[there won't be any phenom III]]></description>
			<dc:creator>JEskandari</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:35:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27769</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>romulous says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27669</link>
			<description><![CDATA[AMD Bulldoza will be faster than pentium 4 ... My android phone is faster than a 8086 :P]]></description>
			<dc:creator>romulous</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:31:01 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27669</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>East17 says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27665</link>
			<description><![CDATA[INTEL = puhahahahaa haaaaaaa hahahha uhhuhuhuhuhuhhh uuu :) I can hardly believe my eyes. How can they lie and manipulate so .. "in your face" ?!!? 2015-3=2012 .. we're in 2011 now ... and Phenom II was launched in 2008 ... Besides, the biggest lie is the one about the promised performance. A design weaker than the Pentium III launched over a decade ago will be 1000% faster and be sold for the current Atom price or lower. My tongue hurts from even reciting so many of other's lies. :)]]></description>
			<dc:creator>East17</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:09:38 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27665</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>pogsnet says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27662</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Atom will be faster than Today's Phenom II but by 2015... Ok I agree of that. But then Atom is still the slowest when that day arrives that's for sure.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>pogsnet</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 06:25:34 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27662</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>zeropercenthotgas says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27652</link>
			<description><![CDATA[RANTING CONTINUED BTW QUIT MAKING ASSUMPTIONS, NO ONE GUESSED THAT ATHLON WAS GOING TO SMOKE PENTIUM III several years ago since preliminary benchmark were in favor of perntium III, so its fair to be neutral on the performance of bulldozer, but i guess fanboys like you can't get it through ur head. Besides it is in everyone's favor for AMD to be competitive again, I don't know why u intel zealots are so bent on having a $1000 core i3. If anyone think I just wasted 1 minute of their life, Sorry 'bout it. BUT, I am tired of all these fanboys throwing their weight around by assuming a product is inferior just by name. END OF RANT HAVE A NICE DAY!]]></description>
			<dc:creator>zeropercenthotgas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:25:03 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27652</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>zeropercenthotgas says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27651</link>
			<description><![CDATA[@ drac LOL bobdozer or boobdozer an invalid term for intel fanboys since bobcat demolished the competition at its level. Therefore, you are saying that bulldozer is so good that it decimates, wait no wrong tense, it WILL decimate the competing intel processors in which case I agree bobdozer is a fitting name for AMD Win. Boobdozer? Well, just another reason for a guy living in his basement to get bulldozer. :D Besides, bulldozer's eight core isn't the traditional cores, its 2 tightly coupled cores sharing resources together, called 1.5 cores by some people. Its not comparing an apple to an apple but a cantalope to an apple]]></description>
			<dc:creator>zeropercenthotgas</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:21:06 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27651</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27650</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Drac lets talk about Bulldozed performance when its out, and wtf do you do with your Pc that you NEED that much power??? Im still very very fine with my OCed P2 940...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:13:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27650</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Cartman says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27649</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Drac lets talk about Bulldozed performance when its out, and wtf do you do with your Pc that you NEED that much power??? Im still very very fine with my OCed P2 940...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Cartman</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 03:13:33 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27649</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Drac says:</title>
			<link>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27648</link>
			<description><![CDATA[amd what?bOObdozzer? how it can be fast,if its 8 core loosing vs Intels 4cores (and 1y old) what are sorry "company" amd is and what are sorry and sad amd fagboys are,defending they sinking amd ship at any cost LOL http://news.softpedia.com/news/AMD-FX-Series-Processor-Launch-Date-Still-Uncertain-213717.shtml - one word - MHUAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH A HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA HAHHAHAHHAHAHAH AHHAHA HAHAHAHHAHAH HAHAHAHHA]]></description>
			<dc:creator>Drac</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:59:26 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>http://fudzilla.com/home/item/23560-new-atoms-will-be-faster-than-phenom-ii#comment-27648</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
