Friday, 04 February 2011 10:05

DICE makes PC owners unhappy

Written by David Stellmack


Cancels Battlefield 1943 & BFBC2 Onslaught add-on
After a lot of waiting and promises from DICE, the studio officially announced that they were officially cancelling the PC versions of Battlefield 1943, and the PC version of the Onslaught add-on for Battlefield Bad Company 2. Both had been said to be in development for PC Battlefield fans.

The news from DICE general manager Karl Magnus Troedsson on the DICE blog confirms the vague rumblings that we have been hearing for several weeks that a decision had be made to cancel the PC versions of 1943 and Onslaught because the resources were needed to work on Battlefield 3.

While Troedsson indicates in his post that the decision to cancel the PC versions of 1943 and Onslaught was a difficult one, it was a necessary one to shift focus to the upcoming release of Battlefield 3. Troedsson does, however, indicate that the studio intends to continue to support the PC release of Battlefield Bad Company 2. It is unclear, however, as to what “support” entails; but we suspect that it likely means bug fixes and minor enhancements and doubtful that there will be any additional content beyond a possible map or two.

The Battlefield community seems to be very unhappy with the decision. While many are excited about the upcoming release of Battlefield 3 for the PC that has been promised to be more than just a console port, a good number of players really seem to have wanted the release of 1943 on the PC. The community seems a little more split on the Onslaught add-on, from what we can tell, with some suggesting that it really does not matter, while others think it should be offered since DICE released it for the console versions.

The focus on Battlefield 3 is understandable, given the news from owner Electronic Arts that they are much more intent on attempting to recapture the FPS crown from Activision with a number of FPS releases. While currently the details on Battlefield 3 are few, we know that we will start to hear more about Battlefield 3 and its Frostbite 2 engine in a lecture from Kenny Magnusson at GDC.

Look for a trailer for Battlefield 3 to show up today and an upcoming spread in Game Informer magazine, including it being featured on the cover. It is expected that EA will then kick off the full court press on Battlefield 3 with a full blown announcement and showing at E3 in June. Currently, the title is still expected to ship yet this year, according to the latest information that we have.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
-65 #1 Warrior24_7 2011-02-04 10:32
This is not surprising since the console is the focus of effort in gaming development and the PC is the step child. As I said before nobody cares about PC gaming.
 
 
+12 #2 muziqaz 2011-02-04 12:01
Onslaught was complete rubbish anyway.
 
 
+42 #3 yourma2000 2011-02-04 12:16
Quoting Warrior24_7:
This is not surprising since the console is the focus of effort in gaming development and the PC is the step child. As I said before nobody cares about PC gaming.



And that's why consoles get all the fancy graphics and DirectX 11s for their games...not
 
 
+22 #4 123s 2011-02-04 13:07
as long BF3 isnt a shitty console port...why not
 
 
+18 #5 Warhead 2011-02-04 13:34
Quoting Warrior24_7:
This is not surprising since the console is the focus of effort in gaming development and the PC is the step child. As I said before nobody cares about PC gaming.



I may be wrong, but I think that console development is influenced by the superior PC platform (DX11 is one example).
 
 
+13 #6 bardenck 2011-02-04 14:43
i once was warrior's way, then i bought a pc....never going back...either way it would feel nice not to be left out of the onslaught stuff, include it in bc3..
 
 
-52 #7 Warrior24_7 2011-02-04 14:52
If anybody cared about PC gaming then cancelling the PC version, and keeping the console versions wouldn't have happened, the Crysis 2 demo would be on the PC not the 360, the PC would be the lead platform for game development, not the console, there would be no need to "port" from the console to the PC, ect, ect, ect! Nobody cares. Nobody cares about your video card, CPU, DX10, 11,12, or 13, and nobody cares about you! It is what it is. :-|
 
 
+17 #8 bardenck 2011-02-04 14:56
Quoting Warrior24_7:
, the PC would be the lead platform for game development, not the console, there would be no need to "port" from the console to the PC, ect, ect, ect! Nobody cares. Nobody cares about your video card, CPU, DX10, 11,12, or 13, and nobody cares about you!



you cant possibly have played in dx11... why do 360 owners and ps3 owners have to pay for all their map packs and pc owners get them free....most of the time!.. i have 2 360's and a ps3.... and crysis is set to be the benchmark for all games to come....a pc title.... enjoy your dumbed down graphics and overpriced premium and need for your live subsription....
 
 
+15 #9 bardenck 2011-02-04 14:57
i know it cost more for a pc, but you get soo much more....
 
 
-18 #10 123s 2011-02-04 15:12
you guys overrate DX11, it never was about much better graphics too...pc games looks so much better console games because of the much faster hardware, not DX versions
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments