Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 07 September 2007 08:20

ISP can charge for priority traffic

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Net neutrality is out the window in the U.S.

 

In another blow to Net neutrality in the U.S., the U.S. Department of Justice announced that ISPs should be allowed to charge extra for priority Web traffic.

This news comes as the Federal Communications Commission is reviewing high speed Internet policies and the DOJ is apparently opposing Net neutrality. AT&T, Verizon, and Comcast have all said that they want the option to charge customers more for traffic prioritization. Of course, this is totally contradictory to the concept that ISPs should remain neutral and provide equal access to all content on the Internet.

The main argument against Net neutrality is that some customers abuse their connections, and these customers should be forced to pay for a higher level of service; or, they should have to accept a lower tier of priority over customers that are already paying a higher price. The main example that the DOJ is using to make this argument is that it is no different from the different delivery modes offered by the U.S. Postal Service that range from bulk mail delivery to overnight delivery. The DOJ is also saying that without additional revenue streams, expansion of network infrastructure by ISPs will be hammered.

U.S. Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Deborah Platt Majoras encouraged the adoption of Net neutrality regulations quickly to promote investment and innovation. We agree that Net neutrality is important, and that ISPs need to provide equal access to everything on the Internet. It seems, however, that U.S. ISPs would prefer to engage in a discriminatory type of strategy against certain Web sites and services, and/or charge users more for the privilege of accessing these sites.

It amazes us how far behind the U.S. is compared to other countries on the subject of Net neutrality.

Last modified on Friday, 07 September 2007 09:49

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments