Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 26 July 2007 11:14

AMD G3MX memory socket for Opteron

Written by test
Image

Ready in 2009

AMD has revealed that it's working on a new socket for memory expansion for its Opteron processors called G3MX or G3 Memory Extender. AMD is working together with IDT and Inphi to develop this new technology which is based on DDR3 memory.

The G3MX technology allows AMD to use 16 memory modules per CPU socket instead of the current limitation of eight. This might not seem like a big deal right now, but with larger databaes and virtulization technology, this could be a crucial feature for AMD's Opteron servers.

G3MX is only expected to appear in quad socket systems and beyond, so don't expect to see this appear on workstation motherboards or AMD's FX platform, at least not initially.

The trick here is that G3MX works similarly to the buffer on a FB-DIMM, but it's a single buffer instead of separate buffers on each memory module, which should allow for much lower latency.

By using standard DDR3 memory modules, the cost of adding 16 memory modules would be far cheaper than using FB-DIMM's as well.

You can read the AMD press release here
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments