Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC 16nm FinFET Plus in risk production

TSMC’s next generation 16nm process has reached an important milestone – 16nm FinFET Plus (16FF+) is now in risk production.

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 26 September 2007 10:33

US Supreme Court to rule on Quanta case

Written by

Image

Ramifications world wide

 

The US Supreme Court will make a ruling on a patent case that could affect computer makers.

The court has decided to look at the case which could have far-reaching ramifications for computer makers and other industries with global supply chains.

A group of Taiwanese computer makers bought the case against a South Korean rival who used its patents in an effort to shake down the entire computer industry for several billion US dollars in duplicative licensing fees.

The Supreme Court is being asked if a patent holder can seek royalties from multiple companies as a patented product works its way through the manufacturing process. Quanta Computer wants the justices to overturn a 2006 federal appeals court ruling that they say would open the door for patent holders to do just that.

More her.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments