Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:39

Vonage loses appeal in Verizon case

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Appellate Court upholds 2 of 3 findings


We reported
yesterday that Voice over Internet Protocol (VOiP) telephony provider Vonage had lost a patent infringement case to Sprint Nextel and was ordered to pay $69.5 million plus royalties on future business to Sprint Nextel. The jury in that case was likely persuaded by arguments previously presented by Sprint Nextel’s attorneys in the successful lawsuit against Vonage by Verizon Communications Corporation; in that case Vonage was ordered to pay Verizon $58 million for patent infringements plus future business royalties.  Vonage had appealed the Verizon verdict to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Vonage lost another round today when the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the Verizon verdict.  However, the Appellate Court issued a somewhat contradictory ruling:  it threw out one of the three patent violation verdicts and upheld the other two.  As the damage award of $58 million was based on all three patent infringement findings, the Appeals Court sent the case back to the lower (trial) court and asked it to reconsider the total damage award.  Also pending is an injunction that was awarded by the trial court against Vonage but that had not yet been imposed pending the outcome of the appeal.  Now that the Appellate Court has made its ruling the injunction for the two upheld patent verdicts will likely be enforced within about a month and could shut down the patent infringing portion of Vonage’s VOiP service, which is essentially the core of its business.

Vonage expressed it happiness that the Appeals Court had thrown out one of the patent violation verdicts and sent the case back for reconsideration of the damages amount.  However, the patent violation that was thrown out does not go to the fundamentals of Vonage’s business.  The two patents verdicts that the Appeals Court upheld, U.S. Patent No. 6,282,574 and U.S. Patent No. 6,104,711, define how phone calls are routed over the Internet, which essentially is the basis of Vonage's IP telephony service today.

The patent violation that was vacated for retrial, U.S. Patent 6,359,880, covers how public wireless and cordless Internet gateways communicate with the Internet. Because this technology is not a big part of Vonage's commercial service today, sending the case back to the lower court will likely have little impact on Vonage's actual business.  And the retrial of this particular “880” patent will not likely reduce the damages awarded to Verizon by all that much.

Vonage’s stock has fallen from its IPO price of US$17 to today’s price of US$.96 per share.

Read more here.

Last modified on Thursday, 27 September 2007 14:46

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments