Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 27 September 2007 13:39

Vonage loses appeal in Verizon case

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Appellate Court upholds 2 of 3 findings


We reported
yesterday that Voice over Internet Protocol (VOiP) telephony provider Vonage had lost a patent infringement case to Sprint Nextel and was ordered to pay $69.5 million plus royalties on future business to Sprint Nextel. The jury in that case was likely persuaded by arguments previously presented by Sprint Nextel’s attorneys in the successful lawsuit against Vonage by Verizon Communications Corporation; in that case Vonage was ordered to pay Verizon $58 million for patent infringements plus future business royalties.  Vonage had appealed the Verizon verdict to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Vonage lost another round today when the U.S. Court of Appeals upheld the Verizon verdict.  However, the Appellate Court issued a somewhat contradictory ruling:  it threw out one of the three patent violation verdicts and upheld the other two.  As the damage award of $58 million was based on all three patent infringement findings, the Appeals Court sent the case back to the lower (trial) court and asked it to reconsider the total damage award.  Also pending is an injunction that was awarded by the trial court against Vonage but that had not yet been imposed pending the outcome of the appeal.  Now that the Appellate Court has made its ruling the injunction for the two upheld patent verdicts will likely be enforced within about a month and could shut down the patent infringing portion of Vonage’s VOiP service, which is essentially the core of its business.

Vonage expressed it happiness that the Appeals Court had thrown out one of the patent violation verdicts and sent the case back for reconsideration of the damages amount.  However, the patent violation that was thrown out does not go to the fundamentals of Vonage’s business.  The two patents verdicts that the Appeals Court upheld, U.S. Patent No. 6,282,574 and U.S. Patent No. 6,104,711, define how phone calls are routed over the Internet, which essentially is the basis of Vonage's IP telephony service today.

The patent violation that was vacated for retrial, U.S. Patent 6,359,880, covers how public wireless and cordless Internet gateways communicate with the Internet. Because this technology is not a big part of Vonage's commercial service today, sending the case back to the lower court will likely have little impact on Vonage's actual business.  And the retrial of this particular “880” patent will not likely reduce the damages awarded to Verizon by all that much.

Vonage’s stock has fallen from its IPO price of US$17 to today’s price of US$.96 per share.

Read more here.

Last modified on Thursday, 27 September 2007 14:46

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments