Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 08 March 2007 21:03

Vendors lie about disk drive failures

Written by
Image

Fibre channel as reliable as SATA


A study of about 100,000 drives conducted by Carnegie Mellon University proves that vendors are not telling the truth about the reliability of disk drives.

The study says that customers are replacing disk drives at rates far higher than those suggested by the estimated mean time between failure (MTBF) supplied by drive vendors.
 

Fibre Channel (FC) drives are just as reliable than less expensive but slower performing Serial ATA (SATA) drives, the report says. The Carnegie Mellon study examined large production systems, including high-performance computing sites and Internet services sites running SCSI, FC and SATA drives.

The figures shed that annual failure rates were between two and four percent, "and up to 13 percent observed on some systems”. 

 

However data sheets from vendors show that that the failure rates should be only  0.88 percent." However, the study showed typical annual replacement. You can find more details here.

 

Last modified on Thursday, 08 March 2007 21:03
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments