Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 28 August 2008 06:37

FTC loses appeal against Rambus

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Second appellate hearing denied

The U.S.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has turned down the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s request for a second appeal in the FTC’s fight with Rambus over whether Rambus revealed enough about its patented technologies to standard-setting organization, JEDEC (Joint Electron Device Engineering Committee).

The FTC had petitioned the Court of Appeals for an en banc hearing, which would have empanelled a large panel of judges, but was denied its request.

The tiff with Rambus began when the FTC ordered Rambus to stop collecting some patent royalties, but then amended that order to allow the royalties to be collected, but held in an escrow account. The FTC order stated that the memory technology company Rambus, had not adequately revealed the nature of its patented technologies before the standard-setting organization, JEDEC, who establishes the industry standards.

JEDEC ended up advocating some of the contents of the Rambus patents as the new standard for all computer chips, thus potentially giving Rambus a monopoly in meeting the standard. When a company is found to have a monopoly on technology that is a standard it is a common practice for the standards-setting body to require modest licensing terms from that company.

In this case, the FTC claimed that Rambus had withheld critical patent information before the JEDEC standard was established.

Rambus expressed satisfaction that it had been in the right all along when the Court of Appeals issued its ruling against the FTC. The FTC said that it was reviewing its options and might try to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on an antitrust claim.

Last modified on Thursday, 28 August 2008 07:20
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments