Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 07 November 2007 23:26

Playstation 3 40GB won't go 65nm

Written by Slobodan Simic

Image

At least not yet


According to the German site, Heise Online, SCEE has smashed the rumor that the new 40GB Playstation 3 will feature a new 65nm Cell processor.

Despite the fact that it doesn't feature a smaller processor, the new 40GB PS3 will consume less power than its predecessors. To be more exact, it will consume around 32.5 percent less, and this comes as a result of different components used in the new model.

Sony Computer Entertainment Europe said that the 65nm Cell is indeed coming, but just not yet. The new 40GB PS3 lacks backward compatibility, comes with fewer USB ports and no memory card reader, but it's priced at just $399.99.


Last modified on Thursday, 08 November 2007 09:03
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments