Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 12 December 2007 11:09

Ripped MP3 files are illegal, claims RIAA

Written by Fudzilla staff

Image

If they're in a shared folder


The
Internet is abuzz with news about the RIAA's recent brief, which contends that if a user rips music from a CD and converts it to an MP3 they are making "unauthorized copies" of audio content.

In a brief filed late last week, the RIAA said that the MP3 files on a PC owned by a file-sharing defendant who had admitted to ripping them himself were "unauthorized copies." You can read the Supplemental brief here (.pdf). Take a look at page 15, if you think you can stomach it.

The defendants in the Atlantic v. Howell case have have denied any copyright infringement, stating that MP3 files on their PC are and "always have been" there for private use. The RIAA says that cannot be so, because they were in their shared file directory on their hard-drive.

The only trouble with this news bit is that many news sites reporting about the brief did a terrible job. They concentrated their efforts at bashing the RIAA, while obviously not even bothering to read the 21-page brief. If you take the time to read it and take a closer look, you'll find that RIAA has set two conditions which need to be fulfilled in order for a ripped MP3 file to qualify as an unauthorized copy.

Here it is, on page 15: "Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recording into the compressed .mp3 format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the authorized copies distributed by Plaintiffs."

So, according to RIAA, in order to make an unauthorized copy it is not enough to just rip the music and make a copy for personal use, as the gung ho IT hacks would have you believe. To get in trouble with the law you also need to place it in a peer-to-peer shared folder which basically amounts to clear intent to distribute by anyone's standards.

Even if you have a dislike for the RIAA's ongoing witch hunt, as most people do, it still doesn't justify such severe accusations. You can still rip and copy your discs as long as the copies you've made are for personal use only, and you're not distributing them. Here is what the U.S. Supreme Court has stated about the issue, and you should probably trust them a bit more than tech news sites and FUD spreading forums.
The record companies, my clients, have said, for some time now, and it's been on their Website for some time now, that it's perfectly lawful to take a CD that you've purchased, upload it onto your computer, put it onto your iPod. There is a very, very significant lawful commercial use for that device, going forward.

Last modified on Thursday, 13 December 2007 03:22

Fudzilla staff

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments