Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 28 June 2007 02:00

PowerColor Radeon HD 2600 XT - Game benchmarks and Conclusion

Written by test
Image

Will it beat the GeForce 8600 GT?

 

Let’s move on to Company of Heroes

   
Company of Heroes    
           avg         max          min
1,024x768 75.9 153.6 34.3
1,280x1,024 55.7 113.4 21.9
1,440x900 44.4 93 20.6
1,680x1,050 35.8 75 14.7
1,920x1,200 29.5 59.4 12.2
 

The numbers looks pretty solid here all the way through to 1,920x1,200, as in this strategy game you’ll do just fine around 30fps. It even manages to beat a GeForce 8600 GTS here at lower resolution and you really have to crank up the resolution before the Radeon HD 2600 XT takes a beating here.

 

One problem we encountered was that 4xFSAA didn’t work in Company of Heroes, although this is most likely a driver issue. Hopefully this is something AMD will resolve, although, if CoH takes as much of a performance penalty as the other tests, it might not be worth the effort to enable it.

 

Finally we have F.E.A.R. 

 

F.E.A.R.      
           avg          max          min
1,024x768 73 152 40
4xFSAA 36 88 12
1,280x1,024 49 102 26
4xFSAA 24 60 7
1,680x1,050 37 76 20
4xFSAA 18 51 6
1,920x1,200 30 61 16
4xFSAA 14 48 5

The results here are nothing short of disappointing, as the Radeon HD 2600 XT takes a real beating here. It is only ahead at 1,024x768, anything higher than that and even the 8600 GT beats it. Still, the game is just about playable at 1,920x1,200, so we can’t complain too much.

 

Conclusion

 

So there you have it, our first review of a Radeon HD 2600 XT with GDDR3 memory. Is it worth getting one? Well, it depends on your preferences and how much or how little money you want to spend. It’s not a bad graphics card and although we have yet to take a closer look at the UVD features and HDMI over DVI, this card should prove to be a good mid-price buy. It’s cheaper than a GeForce 8600 GT, although this might not be the case for long and it performs better in most circumstances. Overclock it a little bit and it gets even better, but still not at GeForce 8600 GTS beater, maybe the GDDR4 version can manage this.

 

We’d also like to thank PowerColor for letting us test this card in their offices and for the time they took to help us get this review done.

(Page 3 of 3)
Last modified on Saturday, 30 June 2007 10:40
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments