Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 16 August 2007 17:27

Intel Celeron 430, E2160 & E6700 shootout - 4  S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

Written by Eliot Kucharik

Image Image

Review: Low end parts go to 3600 MHz



Game Benchmarks:
We used one very popular and one not so popular game, both with very nice graphics. Our MSI board was not able to reduce the FSB to 200MHz with the E6700 CPU, but you can expect it would have been slighly faster.

S.T.A.L.K.E.R. is still one of the most popular games and we chose to use it as a benchmark.

Image

We see S.T.A.L.K.E.R. does not care so much about the CPU, but heavily relies on the graphic-card.

(Page 5 of 10)
Last modified on Sunday, 28 October 2007 01:31
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments