Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 22 June 2010 09:42

FCC engages in closed door meetings over net neutrality reform

Written by Jon Worrel

fcclogo

Public scrutiny, North Korea style

The Federal Communications Commission has recently gotten itself into a potential messy situation with public media activist groups and pro Net Neutrality campaigners over the issue of transparent reform. A few hours ago, U.S. regulators and commissioners held private talks behind closed doors with phone and cable companies about a compromise that would give government statutory jurisdiction over Internet infrastructure without adopting controversial new rules that the telco providers oppose.

Participants in the talk include the infamous ISP oligopoly in the United States - Comcast, Time Warner, Cox, Charter, AT&T and Verizon - as well as Google, eBay and its subsidiary Skype in a bid to reach compromise on the FCC's proposed "third way" to regulate the content and infrastructure of the Internet. But the range of content and applications companies who feel to be a significant part of the overarching debate are not necessarily limited to these three Silicon Valley giants. The Open Internet Coalition and Free Press also stand as major vocal contributors to the discussion and have fiercely battled a long string of misinformation campaigns on Net Neutrality over the past couple years, including intense lobbying efforts from phone and cable companies and their Astroturf groups.

"It is stunning that the FCC would convene meetings between industry giants to allow them determine how the agency should best protect the public interest," declared Free Press. "The Obama administration promised a new era of transparency, and to 'take a backseat to no one' on 'Net neutrality, but these meetings seem to indicate that this FCC has no problem brokering backroom deals without any public input or scrutiny."

For many avid supporters of Net Neutrality and media reform, isn't hard to anticipate the purposes of the behind-closed-doors meeting. Analysts suggest that the telcos are trying to persuade the agency that its new hybrid legislative framework proposal is too novel of an idea for practical purposes and has never been tested in a real-world trial. Corporate technology blog The Hill recently reported that stakeholders will debate broadband reform this Friday, June 25, at the first in a series of talks on how to overhaul communications policy framework. However, the big question to consider is whether or not public consumer groups count as "stakeholders," and the specific names of the parties involved.

"This secretive process is especially unseemly for what is supposed to have been the most transparent FCC in history," the Media Access Project's Andrew Schwartzman commented. Nevertheless, if this is a transparent government, we would truly hate to see what an opaque one would entail.

Last modified on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 10:36

Jon Worrel

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments