Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 02 September 2010 12:06

Nvidia said to be mulling GPU combo southbridge

Written by


For Sandy Bridge apparently
Digitimes is reporting that Nvidia engineers are currently hard at work on a new chipset solution that should combine the functions of a southbridge with a proper Nvidia GPU.

The purported development is aimed at Intel’s upcoming South Bridge platform and it would allow vendors to buy Intel’s Sandy Bridge platform sans Cougar Point southbridge. Digitimes believes that vendors could thus save between $10 and $15 per PC and that they could use the piggy-banked cash to get Nvidia’s new chip. It is unclear, however, how much Nvidia’s chip would cost.

However, we’d advise you to take this with a grain of salt. Nvidia has been ebroiled in a lengthy legal dispute with Intel over licensing rights and although recent developments have gone Nvidia’s way, we’re still a bit skeptical. Licensing aside, Sandy appears to pack quite powerful graphics, so it would appear that vendors and consumers alike wouldn’t have too much interest to bother. The days of Intel’s god-awful 945 GC are long gone.

Nvidia’s chipset business is all but gone and although hordes of nostalgic enthusiasts would like to see Nvidia back in the market, there’s little chance for a comeback. The AMD market is gone and even without the licensing brouhaha Intel’s new CPUs already pack graphics, so there’s really not much room for Nvidia or any other player for that matter.

More here.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+17 #1 Squall_Leonhart 2010-09-02 13:50
powerful

is digitimes high?
 
 
+4 #2 blandead 2010-09-02 19:49
I believe fud reported that

"the performance of the GPU on the tested Core i7 2600 was around 10 percent faster than the AMD HD 5450"

so compared to their G45 it's a pretty big step forward for entry level graphics.

I don't think they will be competitive in mainstream or performance though on their faster chips, but who knows.
 
 
+5 #3 jon 2010-09-02 20:01
I asked Anand Shimpi about his opinion on the matter, and he said "if they dangle it off the CPU it might work. Regardless, southbridge design/validation is a pain."
 
 
-7 #4 INSPIREARUN 2010-09-04 22:36
INTEL'S NEW SANDY BRIDGE PROCESSOR CRUSHED THE UPCOMING AMD'S BULL DOZER PROCESSOR AND ALSO EXPELLED ITS OWN NEHALEM PROCESSOR.

GO FOR MORE
http://lensfire.blogspot.com/search/label/tech
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments