Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 21 October 2010 08:49

Delete those photos of Stonehenge from your site

Written by Nick Farell
y_questionmark

Stupid copyright enforcement of the day
English Heritage, which is supposed to be protecting Stonehenge for humanity, has been taking it upon itself to serve up cease and desist notices on photosharing and stock photo sites.

The big idea is English Heritage, which is backed by the UK government, claims that any picture of Stonehenge breaks its copyright. Any use of the snaps “for commercial interest” have to be approved by English Heritage which we guess also means money changing hands.

One recipient of a cease and desist letter, the site FotoLibra, is trying to figure out on what legal basis English Heritage is making this claim, noting that English Heritage "has been their responsibility for 27 of the monument's 4,500 year old history.”

We would have thought that after 4,500 years after its creator's death Stonehenge would be public domain and almost certainly prior art. We know that that English Heritage is probably having a bit of trouble struggling with a Government which wants to cut back a bit on spending, but making a swift buck out of websites who run pictures of ancient monuments is fairly daft.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
0 #1 Tr0y 2010-10-21 10:02
Besides a huge "banking industry *)" - what else do the English have? They must become really creative to finance their huge national deficit.


---
*) Definition of "industry": "Industry refers to the production of an economic good."

... I would call worthless papers and financial "products" hardly "economic goods".
 
 
+3 #2 Wolfdale 2010-10-21 11:50
this i nothing but a joke tbh..
if they really want to enforce copyright, they should have done so from the start,
now that pictures and content of this topic are literally all over the place, heck microsoft used it in several of their products,
they cant possibly claim copyright after so many years of public allowance of it,

would be fun to patent and copyright something.. then wait till half the world uses it, and THEN suddenly claim copyright and make millions of it..
even tough several companies have tried this, its not gonna work

its like the police putting a prisoner in jail without a toilet.. at some point they have to pee, and then what.. fine them for peeing on the floor?
 
 
+7 #3 Nooblet 2010-10-21 12:43
fyi... talking to me infringes my copyrights, as my genius thoughts and ideas will stream into that weasel brain of yours and serve for commercial purposes.
 
 
+1 #4 deadspeedv 2010-10-21 12:46
Good old poms. Nice to see they still have intelligence

/sarcasm
 
 
0 #5 Fud_u 2010-10-22 00:23
Lol, here come the greedy snob.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments