Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 16 January 2008 07:08

The RIAA does it again

Written by David Stellmack

Image

Goes after the little guys


The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is on the march again, hunting down and prosecuting those dangerous individuals who are sharing music with each other and depriving the recording industry of potential small profits against its millions.  The latest RIAA claim against two individuals has been accepted for litigation by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a public interest, non-profit organization.

The RIAA brought an action in U.S. District Court in Arizona against a couple, The Howells, on the grounds of “attempted” copyright infringement without any actual dissemination or transfer of the alleged copyrighted music having occurred.  The Howells allegedly committed their offense by using Peer to Peer (P2P) file sharing software and having downloaded approximately 13 music selections that were then stored in their music file directories.

There is no proof that the files were even opened or listened to or that the files were disseminated or shared with anyone else.  In fact, after this case was brought, the RIAA then filed a Motion for Summary Judgment asking the Judge to rule in its favor immediately on the basis that there were no points to be successfully argued by the defendants.  At this point, the EFF and The Howells’ lawyers decided this case was worth challenging and have now filed an Amicus Curiae (“friend of the court”) Brief in Opposition to the RIAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment against the Howells.  

The amicus curiae hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment in the Howells’ case, Atlantic v. Howell, is scheduled for January 24, 2008.  This is an important case in that it tests the rules for what constitutes actual copyright infringement.  To date, it does not consist of attempt.

Read the Amicus Curiae brief here.

Read the complete posting of EFF’s Senior Staff Attorney here.

Last modified on Wednesday, 16 January 2008 09:25

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments