Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 12 November 2010 16:26

Apple will indeed use Fusion

Written by Fuad Abazovic
appleamd

Industry sources contradict AMD spin

A very reliable source close to AMD has informed us that Apple will indeed use Fusion APUs in some of its upcoming products.

Although AMD was prompt to issue a statement denying our previous report, it appears that this was merely an attempt at damage control. The leak obviously raised many eyebrows at Apple, which has a very good track record in keeping its upcoming products secret, unless someone drops them in a California bar, of course.

We still don't know the exact details of the deal, but we will try to learn more over the weekend. It's a good time to be an AMD shareholder but be aware that Apple is definitely upset about the whole leak. Very upset.

Also read:

Apple to embrace AMD Fusion?
Last modified on Friday, 12 November 2010 16:46
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+80 #1 Blue Fear 2010-11-12 17:20
Whatever it takes to make Apple angry. They need to realize they are not special.
 
 
+22 #2 AndromedaB 2010-11-12 17:25
i guess its good to like get intel's ego back in check but by god please use it on the low performance products (like macbook air) please
 
 
-63 #3 Dracusis 2010-11-12 18:19
Quoting Blue Fear:
Whatever it takes to make Apple angry. They need to realize they are not special.




Your definition of special is flawed - special means unique.

p.s. Hitler is special.
 
 
+36 #4 Scootiep 2010-11-12 18:56
Quoting Dracusis:
Quoting Blue Fear:
Whatever it takes to make Apple angry. They need to realize they are not special.


Your definition of special is flawed - special means unique.

p.s. Hitler is special.


actually special has many meanings and context is everything:

Special(a): unique or specific to a person or thing or category; "the particular demands of the job"; "rights peculiar to the rich"; "the special features of a ...

Special: first and most important;

And many many more. There was nothing flawed about his statement. This concludes your grammar lesson for the day.
 
 
+44 #5 Scootiep 2010-11-12 18:58
As an unrelated complaint, fricking increase the comment length Fudzilla! Jesus Christ, the comment length limits are ridiculous. It's like you want us all to argue like George Bush or something.
 
 
-5 #6 Bl0bb3r 2010-11-12 20:17
Or they should start a wiki, seeing all those enlightened posts, it would put wikipedia to shame.
 
 
-1 #7 moKi 2010-11-12 20:34
Another high quality article on Fud...
 
 
+11 #8 hoohoo 2010-11-12 21:30
I am looking for a new notebook, and I've been holding off because of Fusion and Sandy Bridge.

I think Apple notebooks running Linux are a beautiful thing, had a 15" Macbook Pro, ran Fedora on it, it was a fantastic setup.

So I look forward to an Apple Fusion notebook.
 
 
+8 #9 hoohoo 2010-11-12 21:34
@Dracusis

Questionable. Was Hitler special (ie unique), or merely distinct from Stalin, Hirohito, Bush II, or other warmongers?

Certainly Hitler did not invent genocide and concentration camps and death camps. He just took these things to their logical conclusion.
 
 
-20 #10 awol 2010-11-13 04:42
Quoting Dracusis:
Quoting Blue Fear:
Whatever it takes to make Apple angry. They need to realize they are not special.




Your definition of special is flawed - special means unique.

p.s. Hitler is special.



Good intention, don't let the thumb-downs discourage you.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments