Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

LG G Watch R ships in two weeks

The LG G Watch R, the first Android Wear watch with a truly round face, is coming soon and judging by…

More...
LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG unveils NUCLUN big.LITTLE SoC

LG has officially announced its first smartphone SoC, the NUCLUN, formerly known as the Odin.

More...
Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft moves 2.4 million Xbox Ones

Microsoft has announced that it move 2.4 million consoles in fiscal year 2015 Q1. The announcement came with the latest financial…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 16 November 2010 10:55

AMD Fusion E-350 performance revealed

Written by


Outpaces dual-core Atom D525 and ION
Several have reviewers had a go at AMD's upcoming Brazos platform based on the Zacate APU core and the first results are promising, but not what we'd call spectacular.

On the graphics front Zacate succeeds in outpacing both previous AMD solutions and current Intel ones by a fair margin. The only system that came close was our Zotac nettop, which has an Nvidia ION integrated graphics chipset. The 1.6GHz part proved that it could easily beat Intel's dual-core Atoms and in terms of graphics performance it managed to pull ahead of previous AMD Danube and Nile mobile platforms in some tests.

CPU performance is not as great, as Zacate manages to beat the Atom, but not K8 or C2D based parts, even the entry level ones. Still, this is quite impressive for a 75mm2 die with an 18W TDP, as it's simply not in the same league as 25W or 35W parts.

Getting back to the graphics, it's worth noting that Zacate manages to outperform most available IGP solutions, although it does lose to the 890GX and even some Intel platforms in CPU intensive tests. It's roughly 30 percent slower than AMD's HD 5450 discrete  or Nvidia's 320M mobile core.

Although it manages to outperform Intel's mobile IGPs by a wide margin, the Zacate is still far behind entry level discrete parts. Of course, Intel isn't asleep at the switch. With such heated competition from its chief rival, perhaps it won't hesitate to whip up some Sandy Bridge-based CULV 2011 solutions, which could have considerably better graphics performance than current, CULV 2010 offerings.
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments