Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 19 January 2011 10:24

EVGA GTX 570 Superclocked tested - 3. Testbed

Written by Sanjin Rados
570-sc-front-thumb

Review: Reference design, higher clocks


Testbed

Motherboard: EVGA 4xSLI
CPU: Core i7 965 XE (Intel EIST and Vdrop enabled)
Memory: 6GB Corsair Dominator 12800 7-7-7-24
Harddisk:   OCZ Vertex 2 100 GB
Power Supply: CoolerMaster Silent Pro Gold 800W
Case: CoolerMaster HAF X
Fan Controler: Kaze Master Pro 5.25"
Operating System: Win7 64-bit
263.09_desktop_win7_winvista_64bit
10.12 CCC

570-sc-testbed

(Page 3 of 8)
Last modified on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 12:00
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+1 #1 LASER 2011-01-19 16:36
ok its 575 running high... but 156GBps? kidding? OC Asus card to get 180GBPS which results in crashing 580's numbers..
m still looking for GTX Phantom but its not available....
 
 
0 #2 MATTEEDO 2011-01-19 17:36
Good review but why put the 6950/6970 in the 2nd and 3rd spot on the graph when they should be 5th and 6th?
 
 
0 #3 bobrollins 2011-01-19 19:51
Quoting MATTEEDO:
Good review but why put the 6950/6970 in the 2nd and 3rd spot on the graph when they should be 5th and 6th?

Agreed! It should look a little more like this
http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/7374/graphw.png

Minus the inaccurate grid, but I can't complain about a free kids website that lets you make a quick free draft.

Edit: I used the one from AVP @ 1920x1080. It's been a peeve of mine about most of the reviews here. And Mine could be changed depending on where you place importance, w/AA or without. Oh and I mixed up the order of performance, on the 6970/570 SC. It was done in a hurry so sue me if its a big deal.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments