Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 24 January 2011 15:38

Android patent fraud turns out to be pants

Written by Nick Farell
google_android_logo

Storm in a teacup
The open sauce world was all a flutter after a patent reform activist Florian Mueller published what he believes to be new evidence of copyright infringement in Google's Android software platform.

What he found was that Android code repository that have Sun copyright headers identifying them as proprietary and confidential. His reasoning would lend weight to Oracle's case that Google nicked its code for Android. However, despite Mueller's claims that everything is a cut and paste, it looks like the files were found in a compressed archive in a third-party component supplied by SONiVOX, a member of Google's Open Handset Alliance (OHA).

When all was new in the open-source world, SONiVOX was called Sonic. It was used to build an Embedded Audio Synthesis (EAS) framework and accompanying Java API wrappers. When EAS was first published into to the Android Open Source Project (AOSP) code repository one of the files that was included in the initial code commit was MMAPI.zip and this archive contains SONiVOX's implementation of a Java ME Mobile Media API (MMAPI) wrapper.

Some of the files included in the archive for testing purposes were adapted from code that originated in Sun's MMAPI reference implementation (MMAPI RI) and the J2ME Wireless Toolkit (JWT). This code from Sun is publicly available and can be downloaded at no cost from the Sun Developer Network website.  It is dodgy code  because , it's distributed under licensing terms that restrict redistribution.

But Android does not use the zip file at all and many are wondering what it is doing there. The worst thing that Sun could do is issue a take-down notice which Google would be happy to oblige.

Mueller's new evidence is not a part of the Oracle and Google legal wars. Oracle seems to be going to court arguing that certain files in AOSP that appear to be based on decompiled versions of classes from Sun's own Java implementation.

What all this debate has done is proved that Oracle's copyright case against Google's android is not as strong as its IP charges.  Our guess is that we will not hear much about the copyright claims as the case gets closer to trial.


Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+11 #1 Jaberwocky 2011-01-24 17:10
Quote
"The open sauce world"


Linux has the penguin
Java has the coffee cup with steam coming off it.

Sounds like you've hit the nail on the head for a logo for the open source software community.

A bottle of Tomato Ketchup with the lid off,sitting on the floor next to it.The label on the bottle reads Open Source. :D
 
 
0 #2 Fud_u 2011-01-25 07:44
Seriously Oracle? I'm a web developer. I find many people write the same code the way I write it because I was taught that way. Structurally, the code might look the same in some part but the overall function is entirely different. .


Quote:
can be downloaded at no cost from the Sun Developer Network website. It is dodgy code because , it's distributed under licensing terms that restrict redistribution.


It seem like a trap to me. It's ironic how they let everyone download it for free but then told them they can't tell their friend or share it. Dodgy code indeed. The "law" should band this kind of practice.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments