Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 08 February 2011 16:16

AMD Phenom X6 1100T and X4 840 tested - Conclusion

Written by Eliot Kucharik

phenomIIX6_logo topvalue75px

Review: Speed updates, one Phenom is an Athlon

 

 

Before we render a conclusion, let's have a look at the overall benchmark results:

amd_phenom_840_1100T_benchmarks

Because we had no X4 640 at hand, we just reduced the multiplier by 0.5x to get results. As you can see the X4 645 is just 1.7% faster then it's 100MHz slower counterpart.

 

Costs:

Nowadays we have an odd situation at least in Europe. Memory prices are below sublevels, with just 40€ per 4GB kit, but Intel CPU prices have increased while AMD has reduced its prices. An 890GX board is available for about €77, while an H55 board costs around €80. The 4850 1GB card is still available for just 77€ which is not a bad deal. If you are not into overclocking AMD gives you the best bang for your buck, but when you do love to overclock Intel can keep up with the costs while the overclocked CPUs proved to be more power efficient. Also, the 890GX onboard graphics are superior the onboard graphics solution from Intel at least up to the H55 generation.

amd_phenom_840_1100T_costs

 

Conclusion:

The flagship Phenom II X6 1100T is not a cheap CPU but considering its six cores and the overall good performance, the €199,75 price tag doesn't soud bad, either. We could manage 4GHz with our sample which is also pretty good, but as the benches show, an overclock to 3.85GHz on our 1055T sample manages to come close to the 4GHz result despite the 150MHz less clock due to higher memory and Hypertransport clocks. Depanding what you want to do, the Phenom II X6 is good choice but the 1100T comes with a price premium.

The new Phenom II X4 840 is of course not a Phenom. It's just an Athlon II X4 650 but suprisingly it's cheaper than the 100MHz slower clocked X4 645. At just €90,- it's clearly a bargain. Of course we always state an AMD is not as fast as an Intel CPU because nobody cares to optimize the code for AMD besides Microsoft, but for everyday work and gaming it's a great CPU and AMD does support its sockets much longer than Intel, so it's more future proof.

When planning a new system, investing more in a good graphics card is always better compared to a slightly faster CPU. The Athlon II X4 650 aka Phenom II X4 840 is our recommandation for consumers on a tight budget.

 

top-value-2010

AMD Phenom II X4 840 

 

(Page 4 of 5)
Last modified on Wednesday, 09 February 2011 01:55
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+22 #1 milkod2001 2011-02-08 19:17
Conclusion:
don't be fool and better keep your €199,75,Bulldozer is coming very soon.

Those graphs are just awful, why not to put names of CPUs on left instead of that colour scale. It looks very noobish and takes ages to find what color stands for.
 
 
+5 #2 SlickR 2011-02-08 19:23
As always the CPU benchmarks always suck.
You can't recognize one cpu from another because there are 20 tested at one time and all have similar color.

Don't do these reviews fudzilla, because they suck.
 
 
+14 #3 The_Wolf88 2011-02-08 19:54
Crap !

Please change your diagrams design it makes me sick !!
 
 
+6 #4 neo222 2011-02-08 20:16
Seriously Fudo needs to learn ..atleast to use charts in excel..Pathetic Graphs!!
 
 
+8 #5 D31337Antics 2011-02-08 20:45
Why don't I see atleast the lowest end I7 on here?

I kind of wanted to see how it stacked up. :(

I have the 1055t in my system and I am still really happy with it but man... can't wait for the bulldozer! :)
 
 
+8 #6 Nerdmaster 2011-02-08 22:19
Test less cpus. Put names on graphs. Larger grapghs.
 
 
+4 #7 FlOw 2011-02-09 04:25
Yeah, those charts are a little hard to comprehend... would something like this be better?
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4590/benchmarkcharttemp.png

I made it with the "benchmark summary" data(top of page 4), so it should have the same info as that chart...
 
 
+5 #8 TechHog 2011-02-09 21:05
Wait, why are the tests performed on Windows XP? I can't think of a single logical reason for that...
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments