Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 25 May 2011 11:02

AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom D525+ION2 - Benchmarks

Written by Eliot Kucharik

E-350_vs_D525_ASRock_front_small top-value-2008-lr

Review:
Intel Atom is still dead




Benchmarks

Today we did the same benches as we did in the Sandy Bridge review. As you will see, especially the single thread performance of the Atom is about half of the E-350, but in multi-threaded applications the performance is quite on par, regardless of the 200MHz higher clock of the Atom. In the gaming department the ION2 and the Radeon 6310 are also on par, but only because the ION2 benefits from 512MB of dedicated DDR3 memory.

 

E-350_vs_D525_CB

 

E-350_vs_D525_CBogl

Of course the comparision with the i3-2100T is unfair, because here we used a Radeon HD6870.

 

E-350_vs_D525_lame

 

E-350_vs_D525_x264

 

E-350_vs_D525_rarenc

 

E-350_vs_D525_rardec

 

E-350_vs_D525_truecrypt

 

E-350_vs_D525_FarCry2

Because the FarCry2 bench did not allow for low settings in DX10, we had to settle for DX9 with Low/Low/Low and the rest of the settings are medium.

 

(Page 4 of 6)
Last modified on Saturday, 28 May 2011 00:13
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments