Featured Articles

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel plans Haswell refresh in Q2 2014

Intel has been executing its tick tock strategy flawlessly since January 2006 and now there is some indication that we might…

More...
Xbox One demoed running GTX card

Xbox One demoed running GTX card

It looks like the Xbox One just cannot catch a break. We have stumbled upon a report claiming that Xbox One…

More...
Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell Pentium and Core specs surface

Haswell is out and now we have the complete specs for Intel’s first batch of fourth generation Core parts, as well…

More...
EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

EVGA GTX 770 ACX 2GB previewed

Nvidia is hoping that the Geforce GTX 770 will be a very popular product, and EVGA obviously share this view, as…

More...
Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 770 Phantom reviewed

Gainward has now officially unveiled its custom version of the Geforce GTX 770, the Gainward GTX 770 Phantom. Based on the…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 25 May 2011 11:02

AMD E-350 vs Intel Atom D525+ION2 - Power-Consumption

Written by Eliot Kucharik

E-350_vs_D525_ASRock_front_small top-value-2008-lr

Review:
Intel Atom is still dead

Power-Consumption

While the ASRock ION 330HT box is an original one, we used a ITX case with 80W PSU for the E-350 and D525. We also removed the WLAN card of the Zotac board, so Zotac has no disadvantage due to an extra card. First, we take a look at power efficiency in Cinebench, meaning under very high and threaded loads.

 

E-350_vs_D525_CBpower


E-350_vs_D525_CBeff

The efficency of both the Intel Atom and the AMD E-350 are dissapointing. Any Intel desktop CPU is more efficient and of course ARM is also miles ahead.

 

E-350_vs_D525_power

In the power consumption department the old Atom/ION combination still leads slightly but just about 4W more for either Atom D525+ION2 and E-350 are not that bad either. The Zotac board draws 1.7W when switched off, which is dissapointing, while the ASRock ION box did the correct thing and does not use any energy at all. The blu-ray test was done with a file on the SDD, so using a real drive would add about 7-8W.

 

(Page 5 of 6)
Last modified on Saturday, 28 May 2011 00:13
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments