Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 22 June 2011 09:11

AMD won’t endorse SYSmark 2012

Written by


Not pleased with the results apparently
AMD has announced that it won’t endorse the SYSmark 2012 benchmarks since it does not meet AMD’s expectations.

AMD believes that the benchmark does not deliver clear and reliable measurements, hence it fails to meet its objective. The chipmaker is also withdrawing from BAPCo, an industry consortium set up to create and publish the benchmark.

AMD said it would only endorse benchmarks based on real-world computing models and applications, which provide users with relevant unbiased information, much like Fudzilla.

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+46 #1 Jigar 2011-06-22 09:41
Quote:
which provide users with relevant unbiased information, much like Fudzilla.


Liers :P
 
 
+37 #2 majorpayne 2011-06-22 10:04
Quote:
AMD said it would only endorse benchmarks based on real-world computing models and applications, which provide users with relevant unbiased information, much like Fudzilla.


Then an author like Fudo must not publish any article here at fudzilla. :lol:
 
 
+30 #3 agent_47 2011-06-22 10:10
eemmm, y did you not link the source? is it coz AMD logically explained their reason for its choice and managed to make arguments?

i mean, you did not even any give technical details of y AMD denounced it.

anyways, here is a cource:
http://blogs.amd.com/nigel-dessau/2011/06/21/1006/

also nvidia also left it...
 
 
+46 #4 hanoking 2011-06-22 10:35
Article forgets to mention that AMD + Nvidia + VIA dumped Bapco and not only AMD. This leaves only Intel alone, what a coincidence, now people should buy Intel with confidence.
 
 
+27 #5 yourma2000 2011-06-22 10:51
Quote:
which provide users with relevant unbiased information, much like Fudzilla



:-|
 
 
-41 #6 Drac 2011-06-22 11:17
Why then you visiting this site if you accusing they staff of lying?
Oh,i guess i know - typical trolling :D

Cant wait dan-fagtroll "comment" on this matter LOL

Truth is,amd have problems with they cpus,and thats fact,they delayed bobdozzer already 4 times,that says something about they performance,so nothing strange amd not happy.
But why somebody should care about it,amd not main cpu provider,fact.Only amd fagboys who trolling here will buy much slower,old tech cpus and will troll that they "very guuud" LOL
amd PWND by Intel to easily :D
 
 
+23 #7 fuadzilla 2011-06-22 11:21
vote for openness. vote amd. cheers.
 
 
+18 #8 darkpulse 2011-06-22 11:43
@Jigar

+1! I dont really think Fud is UNBIASED.

Leaving that topic aside, i think its a good move by AMD. Of course users want real-world benchmarks and that is all that matters. Who cares about synthetic or biased benchmarks?
 
 
+13 #9 MrScary 2011-06-22 13:34
Quoting agent_47:
eemmm, y did you not link the source? is it coz AMD logically explained their reason for its choice and managed to make arguments?

Anyways, here is a cource:
http://blogs.amd.com/nigel-dessau/2011/06/21/1006/

also nvidia also left it...

Of course not, they are almost as biased on giving a true review as anandtech, they are totally paid by intel, wich by the way is the only company left to endorse [censored]ing sysmark, nvidia made the only right desicion on his entire life and also left...
But fuworld isn´t going to tell u that, they only sell intel proganda and half truth reports, on behalf his master, intel.
Not only they put on their knees but also the lick its boots.
 
 
+14 #10 MrScary 2011-06-22 13:37
Quoting Drac:
Why then you visiting this site if you accusing they staff of lying?
Oh,i guess i know - typical trolling :D

Cant wait dan-fagtroll "comment" on this matter LOL

Truth is,amd have problems with they cpus,and thats fact,they delayed bobdozzer already 4 times,that says something about they performance,so nothing strange amd not happy.
But why somebody should care about it,amd not main cpu provider,fact.Only amd fagboys who trolling here will buy much slower,old tech cpus and will troll that they "very guuud" LOL
amd PWND by Intel to easily :D



If u have no idea about what u are saying better not act like a clairvoyant, u dont know nothing, u are only the Troll scrayer, nothing else.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments