Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 14 July 2011 13:13

HP puts the thumbscrews in Cisco

Written by Nick Farell


About that upgraded Catalyst 6500 switch
The maker of very expensive printer ink, HP has gone on the attack against Cisco, who has been claiming its new improved Catalyst 6500 switch us better than anything HO offers.

Cisco announced a long-awaited upgrade to Catalyst 6500, which is its most popular  product. It comes with Cisco's Supervisor Engine 2T, a 2-terabit card  which can manage 80 Gbps and triples the 6500's throughput from 720 Gbps to 2Tbps and quadruples the number of devices that can connect to the network, at least if you believe Cisco. Cisco also claimed that an upgrade to Sup 2T on existing Catalyst switches would run customers about $38,000, while an upgrade to a comparable HP switch architecture would likely cost that customer more than $100,000 and gives the customer only 720 Gbps of throughput.

Needless to say HP said that is rubbish. The comparison itself is for an upgrade to the Catalyst 6513E and not the entire Catalyst 6500 portfolio. HP said that Cisco failed to point out that to use the virtual switching system (VSS) on the Catalyst 6500, an upgraded line card is required. Looks like there could be a fight brewing in the networking world.

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments