Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 29 July 2011 08:52

MX vs. ATV Alive experiment failed

Written by David Stellmack
thq_logo

Cheap title & forcing users into DLC not the answer
MX vs. ATV Alive release from THQ was an experiment to see if a new revenue generating model might be something that consumers would embrace. The concept that THQ tried was to sell the title cheap, in this case $39.99, and then put a massive focus on DLC purchases to let the buyer customize and add just the parts that were wanted for the game by purchasing them.

While the idea might have sounded good on paper, according to THQ the entire concept did not resonate well with consumers; many were resentful and claimed they were cheated from getting the full game, as what they got was pretty bare bones.  Other complaints were also that consumers felt forced by the company to purchase DLC to get parts of the game that seemed to be left out.

While the reviews of the game were not very stellar (to say the least), the game did apparently have an initial sales surge because of the low price, but the sales model just didn’t work because of the high costs involved with the DLC. THQ admits, however, that they will continue to explore the concept, but right now have no plans to reintroduce it with another title in the immediate future.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+3 #1 valhar2000 2011-07-29 09:13
If you can call $39.99 low --- I certainly wouldn't. I'm glad people did not reward this shameless rip-off.
 
 
+2 #2 Quartz 2011-07-29 15:32
$39.99 isn't what I'd call a low price.
 
 
+3 #3 bardenck 2011-07-29 16:13
19.99 and they would've sold 6 billion copies and dlc.
 
 
+2 #4 jguernsey 2011-07-29 16:14
I agree! I'm sure you could sink $10 in to DLC in a blink of an eye!
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments