Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 03 October 2011 12:59

Amazon sells Kindle Fire at a small loss

Written by


Hope to make money on content
Amazon’s Kindle Fire is the all the rage these days and according to IHS, Amazon is losing money on each tablet it manages to shift for $199.

The bill of material cost for the Fire is estimated at $191, just $8 less than the price, which means Amazon has a rather tight margin. However, if you add manufacturing and other costs, each Fire tablet sets Amazon back about $209.

Amazon hopes to recoup the loss in the long run, selling content to Fire users. With its vast content library, the concept makes sense. Of course, the BOM cost is also subject to change. Component costs tend to drop over time and if Amazon manages to ship a lot of tablets, prices should be lower, too.

Of course, Apple boasts and equally impressive content vault and it could do the same with its iPad. It just chooses not to.
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments