Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 05 March 2008 07:43

Cyberheat settles porn spam case

Written by David Stellmack
Image

Charges brought by FTC

Cyberheat, a Tucson, Arizona based adults-only Web site, has settled a case brought against it in U.S. District Court by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The case claims that Cyberheat affiliates sent unwanted pornography-related spam to unknowing recipients, some of whom were minors.

The suit was settled by Cyberheat’s agreement to pay a $413,000 settlement, agreeing not to send spam e-mail marketing and to closely monitor the activities of its affiliates.

The FTC brought the action on the grounds that Cyberheat had exposed children and unsuspecting other individuals to sexual images without identifying what the email spam contained. The key phrase the FTC applied to Cyberheat’s actions was "electronic flashing," a violation of the FTC’s Adult Labeling Rule and the Can-Spam Act. 

These regulations require commercial e-mail entities to label sexually explicit materials as such in the subject lines of the emails.

Last modified on Wednesday, 05 March 2008 08:10

David Stellmack

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments