Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 27 October 2011 10:17

iPad was to be Atom based

Written by Nedim Hadzic

apple ipad logo

Jobs’ biography reveals

Steve Jobs’ biography by Walter Isaacson revealed that Apple’s overgrown iPhone dubbed the iPad was intended to be Intel Atom based. Thankfully for the company, Apple’s execs persuaded Jobs to go with ARM.

The biography reveals that Jobs and VP of Industrial Design Jonathan Ive started developing the device in the ‘00s, while the first sketches were revealed in patent applications 2004. Naturally, the sketches showed only the outside and not the innards of the device. 

So, although Jobs planned to go with Intel Atoms, Senior VP of the iPod division Tony Fadell insisted on ARM. Strangely enough, the biography quotes Jobs as saying that it’s "best to trust Intel to make good mobile chips".

This is what Jobs had to say about the matter to his biographer:”"At the high-performance end, Intel is the best. They build the fastest chip, if you don't care about the power and cost. But they build just the processor on one chip, so it takes a lot of other parts. Our A4 has the processor and the graphics, mobile operating system, and memory control all in one chip. We tried to help Intel, but they do not listen much. We have been telling them for years that their graphics suck. Every quarter we schedule a meeting with me and our top three guys and Paul Otellini. At the beginning, we were doing wonderful things together. They wanted this big joint project to do chips for future iPhones. There were two reasons we did not go with them. One was that they are just really slow. They are like a steamship, not very flexible. We are used to going pretty fast. Second is that we just did not want to teach them everything, which they could go and sell to our competitors".

More here.

Last modified on Thursday, 27 October 2011 10:29

Nedim Hadzic

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+1 #1 The blue fox 2011-10-27 17:28
It's better it was not atom based. cant see them getting the same battery life out of an atom system. I could also see people some how geting windows on it also.
 
 
+1 #2 dew111 2011-10-27 22:20
Intel will do what Intel wants to do. Unfortunately, Intel wants to stuff x86 into everything. x86 cores will NEVER be as efficient as RISC cores, and power-saving is the name of the game in mobile devices. Even with a 2+ year advantage in process technology, Intel (or anyone else making x86) still can't beat ARM, MIPS and others for power/performance. It's really a shame; they could crush ARM in every market if they would let go of x86. Then again, they would also need good graphics to make winning SoCs. Faced with obvious deficiencies in their power/performance metrics, Intel just hums louder and cranks out more x86 chips.
 
 
0 #3 fteoath64 2011-10-28 10:03
If the iPad had the Atom chip, it would have bombed in the market!. I am shocked that Jobs had such poor understanding of CPU technologies. Intel had nothing useful in the ultra-mobile space and struggling for sometime.
Once Apple scales the A5 using MP15 core, they will realise the power in the portable market. No other architecture can touch it. Just get an ARM license Intel.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments