Error
  • JUser::_load: Unable to load user with id: 67

Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 31 October 2011 10:27

Initial ultrabook sales fall short of targets

Written by



Acer and Asus miss the mark


The first ultrabooks went on sale a couple of weeks ago and even this early in the game it seems Intel’s new fad seems to be in trouble.

According to Digitimes, both Acer and Asus have missed their shipment targets. It appears both companies will manage to ship about 100,000 units each, well below their 200,000 – 300,000 targets. It appears consumers are simply unwilling dish out $1,000+ for the new toys, some of which are even pricier than similar MacBook Air models.

Acer and Asus did not ramp up their orders yet and it seems poor demand is undermining the entire concept. By the end of Q1 2012, ultrabooks are expected to make up about 10 percent of the market and their share should continue to climb towards the end of the year, as Ivy Bridge processors and Windows 8 enter the fray.

More here.


blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+2 #1 dicobalt 2011-10-31 11:09
Their only feature is that they are thin and light. It's not worth the money to most people who would rather pay less but carry more weight.
 
 
+1 #2 STRESS 2011-10-31 13:30
Quoting dicobalt:
Their only feature is that they are thin and light. It's not worth the money to most people who would rather pay less but carry more weight.

And get more processing power in both departments (CPU, GPU) and potentially even longer battery life
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments