Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 15 November 2011 11:14

Tame Apple press rounds on Kindle fire

Written by Nick Farell

Amazon Logo

Jobs' Mob is terrified

The Tame Apple press has been churning out bad reviews for the Kindle Fire. The New York Times and Wired, which have been acting as Apple's unpaid press office for a number of years now, have all turned out reviews which say that you should not buy the Apple rival and instead should sink your cash into something twice the price from Apple.

While you should not be surprised by such blatant bias from Wired and the New York Times, their reviews have been picked up by Associated Press, here, as evidence that the Fire is getting “mixed reviews.” Wired said that on Jon Phillips had to admit that the Fire “wasn't a dud”, but its real-world performance and utility match neither the benchmarks of public expectation, nor the standards set by the world's best tablets [read Apple 2]. "Fire is a fiendishly effective shopping portal in the guise of a seven-inch slate," Phillips said. "It does nothing very well, save video playback, running various Android apps, and making the business of Amazon shopping alarmingly fun and easy."

The question is that other than running apps, reading, watching movies, buying stuff what is left for a keyboardless netbook to do? David Pogue at the New York Times, said the $US200 price tag would attract some buyers, but "the Fire does not have anything like the polish or speed of an iPad. "You feel that $200 price tag with every swipe of your finger," Pogue said, adding that the Fire is "not nearly as versatile as a real tablet".

Since when did a reviewer compare a product with the top of the range model? It is like saying that a bog standard PC is rubbish because it does not go as well as a high performing Intel Core i7 with a high spec gaming graphics card on board. We have already seen the extent that Apple is going to close down Android tablets with its patent trolling, now it seems that it is really terrified by the prospect of having a tablet which ordinary people can afford on the market.

Less biased is Sam Biddle of technology blog Gizmodo. Gizmodo used to be big fans of Jobs Mob until Steve Jobs sued them and sent its tame police around to steal the servers of its Editors claiming it had stolen an iPhone 4 prototype. Biddle said that the iPad "finally has serious competition" and that Apple should "be afraid". "Reading, watching, browsing, and listening on the Fire are all tremendous, easy fun," he said. "It's not as powerful or capable as an iPad, but it's also a sliver of the price."

Last modified on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 14:19
blog comments powered by Disqus


-5 #1 gsacks 2011-11-15 18:13
Ridiculous article.
-6 #2 trajan2448 2011-11-15 18:40
What is this guy on?
-5 #3 Naterm 2011-11-16 08:48
Why can't you just accept that the iPad is a dramatically superior product to everything else that is out there? Cheap or not, the Fire just isn't that compelling of a product. Of course, I wouldn't buy an iPad either, at least not as it currently is.
+1 #4 Fud_u 2011-11-16 10:19
Some people like to think that their expensive toys is much better so they needed a reason to make them feel better and what's better is to denial other product that are much more superior. iOS is a useless piece of junk when browsing the web. You get most of mobile site and who in the world rather like to see a half baked website anyway?
-2 #5 Naterm 2011-11-16 14:22
Quoting Fud_u:
iOS is a useless piece of junk when browsing the web. You get most of mobile site and who in the world rather like to see a half baked website anyway?

Uh huh... Because it doesn't have Flash, right? Oh, wait, Adobe is dumping mobile flash for HTML5. iOS is the best mobile operating system out there, period. Google is going to beat it numerically, obviously. But it has yet to beat it from a functionality standpoint and I doubt that it ever will. Windows has never been a superior operating system to Mac OS. We'll see the same thing here.

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus


Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments