Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 06 December 2011 12:58

Jobs' Mob permitted to fire over Facebook rants

Written by Nick Farell

applefacebook

Even if it is the truth

A British employment tribunal has allowed Apple to fire an employee for having a rant on Facebook. Employee Samuel Crisp, was a “Genius” at the Norwich Apple Store, but he dared to tell the truth about his iPhone, apps and other aspects of Apple on the social network Facebook.

Apple was not even aware of the comments because the profile was set to private, but one of Crisps “friends” feared that others might depart from the true way and lose their faith in Steve Jobs. So the friend grassed him up to Jobs Mob's black shirts who dragged him away and fired him.

Crisp complained after all he didn't work for Nazi Germany and this was a modern democratic country which sees free speech as a virtue. You should not fire people for speaking their mind. However, Apple told the tribunal that it makes people sign a social media policy which says they are only allowed to say wonderful things about Apple on their blogs, even if this is not true. If the truth is negative, then you are supposed to shut up or lose your job.

The tribunal upheld the company’s decision because it was in writing and Crisp was informed adequately that it was a grounds for dismissal. The moral of the story is that if you want the right to say what you like, be an individual and think different, then don't work for Apple.


Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+14 #1 FlOw 2011-12-06 13:44
Apple's new slogan:
Quote:
Think what we tell you to think
 
 
+3 #2 fuadzilla 2011-12-06 17:02
just stop feeding this kinda evil companies...
 
 
+1 #3 Bl0bb3r 2011-12-06 19:02
Somebody, get a kill order on that judge... he needs to meet he's maker, the red one.
 
 
-1 #4 robert3892 2011-12-07 10:02
Actually many tech companies have similar agreements so the writer of this article obviously didn't do their homework.
 
 
+1 #5 Bl0bb3r 2011-12-07 19:43
Quoting robert3892:
Actually many tech companies have similar agreements so the writer of this article obviously didn't do their homework.



Actually, agreements are valid because they have basis in laws and these agreements under no laws can't override the constitutional right of a person. If free speech is such a right under British const., those that drafted the agreement didn't do their homework either, because it violates the const..

What he did can't be considered a breach of contract either, Facebook or not, where he talked was a private space, and hence he had the right to privacy and say what he wants, while the social media policy should have been valid only on a public place.
 
 
0 #6 youserzero 2011-12-08 03:06
Quoting robert3892:
Actually many tech companies have similar agreements so the writer of this article obviously didn't do their homework.


As someone else already pointed out, you cant take peoples constitutional rights. Who didn't do what homework?
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments