Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 26 December 2011 13:25

Intel considers Qualcomm threat No.1

Written by Fuad Abazovic



AMD not so feisty anymore


Intel tried to do gaming graphics cards and it failed, but when it comes to CPUs for desktop and notebooks, it is currently dominating the market. Even the graphics used in Intel’s latest integrated CPUs these days are quite decent for multimedia and even some basic gaming.

Still, Intel is now shifting its focus and it sees Qualcomm as its main competitor in years to come. We heard this from high ranked sources from within Intel who believe that Qualcomm is the only ARM company that has it all, and Intel wants to take it on.

Intel is carefully watching Nvidia and Texas Instruments, again two strong ARM players, but it still thinks Qualcomm has better time to market, more customers and a much stronger portfolio.

Intel should start shipping Medfield just in time for Windows 8, and in case you’ve missed it, Medfield is a SoC (System on Chip) platform that should find its place to a few tablets and probably even some phones next year. Since Intel is trying to speed development up and put as much pressure on ARM players as possible, its next generation SoC will also come before the end of 2012, and it will use the advanced 22nm process, something we won’t see in ARM chips next year.
 
The ARM alliance has one huge advantage going for it and, of course, it is the price. Intel tries to sell its chips for much more than ARM chip designers, so it will probably face an uphill struggle in entry-level and mid-range markets. When it comes to performance, two years ago we’ve had a Moorestown SoC based phone in our hands, that was really bad on standby battery life, but was able to render much more power intensive stuff than any ARM chip at the time.

This time around, Intel seems to be getting things right. The fight is on, and it starts in the first half of 2012. It will be a fun to watch, just like any heavyweight fight, as long you are not in the middle of it.

Also read:

Medfield failure is not an option for Intel


blog comments powered by Disqus

Comments  

 
+3 #1 dicobalt 2011-12-27 00:26
Considering top performing ARM phones sell for $550-$650 I really doubt cost is an issue for those customers. I doubt that Medfield phones are intended to compete with budget ARM phones.
 
 
+2 #2 fteoath64 2011-12-27 10:47
Intel seems to afraid to mention SamSung which is the power house in ARM designs and has a couple of "hot chips", one on sampling right now and real products releasing in a couple of months.

Qualcomm is a way smaller company who did very well in the past couple of years but we shall see SamSung taking over a decisive lead from 2012 onwards just due to their designs and release dates on "post Tegra" chips.

Intel cannot beat Samsung on mobile cpus unless they take up an ARM license. If X86 can go ultra-low power, they would have done it by now. Even with 3 generations of Atom, Intel is still rather far from the target. They should stop making gpu cores since they are slowing down the technology of the gpu market.
 

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments