Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 14 March 2012 10:47

Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print

Written by Nick Farrell



Out evolved by a fake penis expert


After 244 years, the Encyclopaedia Britannica is going out of print apparently out evolved by Wikipedia's crack team of fake penis experts.

The Encyclopaedia Britannica were once sold door-to-door by a fleet of travelling salesmen and were seen as a sign of intellectual knowledge within the middle class home. From now on Encyclopaedia Britannica will focus primarily on its online encyclopedias and educational curriculum for schools. The last print version is the 32-volume 2010 edition, which weighs 129 pounds and includes new entries on global warming and the Human Genome Project.

However with the Internet becoming the source of information, and it being updated daily, it is difficult for the  Encyclopaedia Britannica to compete. That is not to say that an online Britannica cannot compete with Wikipedia. For a start it is accurate, written by prestigious sources, has carefully edited entries and does not have an editorial team with a chip on its shoulders about who it thinks are important.

Our favourite editor who seemed to want to kill off ever entry related to us had an area of expertise listed as “fake penis expert.”

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments