Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 03 April 2008 10:29

Microsoft fails to fool India's tax man

Written by Nick Farell

Image

Bizarre excuse of the day


After much argie bargie, an Indian court has ruled that Microsoft will have to pay six years of back tax on its software licenses. For the last six years, Microsoft has argued that when it sells a license this should be tax-free profit.

Although Microsoft can appeal, it is starting to look like it will not succeed. The Appeals Commission in Delhi has ruled there is royalty involved in the software transaction, which is taxable. Tax officials said the company can now approach the Income-Tax Appellate Authority (ITAT) and the high court.

Between 1999-2004, Microsoft refused to pay tax in India, using claiming several loopholes including the double taxation avoidance agreement with the U.S. It also argued that since it flogged its software in India through a circuitous route involving several group companies, it counted as a sale rather than a royalty payment involved.

What sank Microsoft's case was the end-user agreement that said “the product is licensed, not sold.” Tax authorities cited this and said if the software is licensed, there has to be a royalty involved.

Royalty, under domestic law, is taxable at 15 per cent.
Last modified on Thursday, 03 April 2008 18:39

Nick Farell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments