Featured Articles

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

IHS teardown reveals Galaxy S5 BOM

Research firm IHS got hold of Samsung’s new flagship smartphone and took it apart to the last bolt to figure out…

More...
Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Galaxy S5, HTC One M8 available selling well

Samsung’s Galaxy S5 has finally gone on sale and it can be yours for €699, which is quite a lot of…

More...
Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel lists Haswell refresh parts

Intel has added a load of Haswell refresh parts to its official price list and there really aren’t any surprises to…

More...
Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

Respawn confirms Titanfall DLC for May

During his appearance at PAX East panel and confirmed on Twitter, Titanfall developer Respawn confirmed that the first DLC pack for…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 20 April 2012 10:29

Agony Aunt helps UK committee sort out net censorship

Written by Nick Farrell



Nothing like asking an expert


It appears that an Independent Parliamentary Inquiry into Online Child Protection might have had a few difficulties finding experts  when it came to the thorny issue of internet censorship.

The committee, which recommends that ISPs should censor internet content, to save children from trolls, er terrorists, sorry paedophiles, got its answers by asking Sun agony aunt Dear Deidre. “Dear Deidre” Sanders was the Inquiry’s first expert witness. She told the committee that kids should be protected from online pornography, but it was OK with children looking at Page 3 girls because “the Editor of The Sun thinks it’s okay” and because 9 million people read it.

So that sorts that out, we expect a comic book style strip with two couples in their under wear to explain the point. Generally the report makes amusing reading and is probably a good reason why politicians should not be allowed near technology questions. For example the committee Chairman Claire Perry MP appear to think that TalkTalk’s network-level filter would work on an ISP's server  without question or an alternative view.

TalkTalk’s HomeSafe doesn’t stop kids looking at whatever they like via smartphone apps and only blocks browser traffic.  It uses filters websites against a blacklist.  Ironically this means that it would censor Perry’s website which hosts the report. The committee also thought it would be easy to censor the internet in the UK based on the same standards that Ofcom and the British Board of Film Classification use. So now a blog will be rated in the same way as a movie.

Of course the Censor has to look at a few hundred flicks a year, when, if Perry gets her way, the Interent will mean ranking a few hundred billion. The report does point out the concerns about two of the biggest ISPs on the grounds.  But it writes these off saying that “their main objections appeared to be ideological, not commercial”.  In other words the idea of censoring the connections of millions of British internet users is not something that should trouble UK politicians.  

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments