Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:37

Intel powered Lava Xolo phone scores well

Written by Nedim Hadzic

atomn logo

Medfield not the best, but not mediocre either

Although Chipzilla may have not been the earliest bird when it comes to smartphones but the company sure knows how to test the waters. It has been reported that Atom Z2460-powered Lava Xolo phone did quite well on benchmarks.

The review suggests that if Intel’s goal was to get in on the action and warn that its x86 is a force to be reckoned with, then it’s fulfilled. Xolo does surprisingly well against the likes of Galaxy S2, Droid Razr Maxx, iPhone 4S and One S, which is quite a feat for a number of reasons. Perhaps most importantly, all of the aforementioned phones boast dual cores, whereas Xolo’s Z2460 is a single-core that relies on hyperthreading only.

While the review clearly shows that the X900’s Atom Z2460 isn’t the king of the hill, it doesn’t say it’s a flop either. Quite the contrary, Intel seems to have surprised everyone as all aspects of Z2460’s performance are at worst decent.

As for sheer CPU power, the X900 isn’t the leader but closely follows the top dogs in each of the tests. A the same time, the platform is as power efficient as newer OMAP 4 based platforms and although it’s not the most efficient of the lot, it’s still good enough to compete with Galaxy S2 and Galaxy Nexus.

The weakest link in the chain is said to be Atom Z2460’s graphics core - PowerVR SGX 540, the same one found in Samsung Galaxy Nexus’ OMAP 4 and even the old Nexus S. This is despite the overclock from 304MHz on the Nexus to 400MHz on Xolo.

The review claims that software compatibility is not a reason for concern since most apps worked flawlessly. The bottom line however is clear – the fact that it even competes with A9 dual cores is compliment enough. Now we want to see more.

You can find the full review here.



Last modified on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:05
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments