Featured Articles

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

Nvidia GTX 770 spec is out

In addition to the GK110 based Nvidia Geforce GTX 780, we managed to get some details regarding the GK104-based GTX 770…

More...
Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 detailed

We managed to confirm the full spec of the upcoming Nvidia Geforce GTX 780 graphics card as well as some performance…

More...
AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

AMD shares take rollercoaster ride

In the last 52 weeks AMD was on a rollercoaster ride, with prices ranging from $1.81 to $6.46. Yesterday it closed…

More...
HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

HIS iCooler Turbo HD 7790 reviewed

Today we’ll take a closer look at a factory overclocked HD 7790, courtesy of HIS. The HIS HD 7790 iCooler Turbo…

More...
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate 3.0 Generation 3 (32GB) reviewed

High capacity USB drives have become commonplace a while ago, but although some memory outfits are peddling huge drives, up…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 26 April 2012 12:37

Intel powered Lava Xolo phone scores well

Written by Nedim Hadzic

atomn logo

Medfield not the best, but not mediocre either

Although Chipzilla may have not been the earliest bird when it comes to smartphones but the company sure knows how to test the waters. It has been reported that Atom Z2460-powered Lava Xolo phone did quite well on benchmarks.

The review suggests that if Intel’s goal was to get in on the action and warn that its x86 is a force to be reckoned with, then it’s fulfilled. Xolo does surprisingly well against the likes of Galaxy S2, Droid Razr Maxx, iPhone 4S and One S, which is quite a feat for a number of reasons. Perhaps most importantly, all of the aforementioned phones boast dual cores, whereas Xolo’s Z2460 is a single-core that relies on hyperthreading only.

While the review clearly shows that the X900’s Atom Z2460 isn’t the king of the hill, it doesn’t say it’s a flop either. Quite the contrary, Intel seems to have surprised everyone as all aspects of Z2460’s performance are at worst decent.

As for sheer CPU power, the X900 isn’t the leader but closely follows the top dogs in each of the tests. A the same time, the platform is as power efficient as newer OMAP 4 based platforms and although it’s not the most efficient of the lot, it’s still good enough to compete with Galaxy S2 and Galaxy Nexus.

The weakest link in the chain is said to be Atom Z2460’s graphics core - PowerVR SGX 540, the same one found in Samsung Galaxy Nexus’ OMAP 4 and even the old Nexus S. This is despite the overclock from 304MHz on the Nexus to 400MHz on Xolo.

The review claims that software compatibility is not a reason for concern since most apps worked flawlessly. The bottom line however is clear – the fact that it even competes with A9 dual cores is compliment enough. Now we want to see more.

You can find the full review here.



Last modified on Thursday, 26 April 2012 15:05
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments