Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 04 July 2012 10:38

Wingnuts up in arms over Google gun ban

Written by Peter Scott



Mexican cartels forced to drive to gun stores


Google has somehow managed to get itself embroiled in a rather controversial debate on gun control in the US.

A month ago, Google Shopping announced it would implement a new policy, whereby it would not promote the sale of weapons or firearm-related accessories as of July 1, AFP reports. Google announced it would not "allow the promotion of weapons or devices designed to cause serious harm or injury" and stated that the ban applies to "guns, gun parts or hardware, ammunition, bombs, knives, throwing stars, and brass knuckles." The move quickly prompted an outcry among gun enthusiasts and all sorts of right-wing conspiracy nuts buffs.

Many bloggers claim Google is interfering with their Second Amendment rights, but they clearly fail to comprehend that Google is a business, not a state entity, and as such it can pretty much do what it wants. The fact that something is legal does not mean Google or any other company has to do it, it just means it can. For example, Apple also does not allow porn on iTunes, although it would be perfectly legal, yet we don’t hear that many free speech advocates complaining. Google search doesn’t come up with porn results, either, and really it shouldn’t.

The National Rifle Association also stepped up to protect the “rights” of its members, by claiming that Google’s new policy is discriminatory.

"This appears to be a calculated political statement by Google at a time when most other large online retailers and search services are increasing the level of information they provide and the number of gun-related products they offer for sale," the NRA said. "Fortunately, with so many other options available to consumers, Google's attempt to limit information about legal and constitutionally protected products will likely prove futile."

Once again the NRA invokes the US Constitution, although it doesn’t seem to quite get it. The fact that a certain right is “constitutionally protected” does not mean that it has to be exercised by everyone, otherwise government could mandate Starbucks to sell assault rifles and that would bring new meaning to free enterprise. Also, militia men preparing for the Rapture would suddenly develop a taste for soy milk lattes.

Of course, conspiracy loving wingnut bloggers were quick to point out that Google’s is one of Obama’s biggest campaign contributors. Google itself and its employees donated $608,000 to Obama’s reelection campaign. However, to put things in perspective, Google Sheldon Adelson or Koch brothers.


Last modified on Wednesday, 04 July 2012 10:48

Peter Scott

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments