Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 24 July 2012 12:45

Google calls in favours in the Senate

Written by Nick Farrell



Ructions in Europe warn lawyers


Google appeals US Senate Judiciary Committee in a bid to get a number of Apple’s iPhone patents considered as industry standards and made available to all.

Legal firm Pinsent Masons has warned that if this succeeds it will have wider ramifications, particularly in Europe,. Deborah Bould, partner in Pinsent Masons’ IP practice and Natasha Pearman of Pinsent Masons’ competition practice have issued a report which said that while this case currently only affects the USA, the US Senate Judiciary Committee is trying to decide whether companies with standards essential patents should be prevented from getting an injunction against infringers.

If this happesn then there is nothing to stop the European Commission widening its ongoing investigation of essential patents and their licensing by companies including Samsung and Motorola Mobility/Google to cover de facto standards along similar lines.

Indeed, Joaquín Almunia Vice President of the European Commission, who is responsible for Competition Policy has stated that he is “determined to use antitrust enforcement to prevent the misuse of patent rights to the detriment of a vigorous and accessible market”, the report noted.

They think it is likely that the Commission would take a similar approach to that adopted in the Microsoft interoperability cases, where a refusal to supply interoperability information to competitors was considered to be an abuse of dominance. It will be difficult for the  Commission to prove there was no reasonable alternative to the de facto standard and that the patent holder had a dominant position; which is not a straightforward analysis.

“However, we believe that the Commission is looking to get its teeth into these complex issues and start to set a precedent for the future that competition and IP should be directed at increasing innovation and not merely awarding or protecting IP rights” the report said.

This is particularly the case where there is little merit or innovation and where these are likely to be detrimental to consumers. Overall, this could open up another avenue in the ongoing IP battles that we are seeing in Europe, they said.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments