Featured Articles

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

Apple iPad Air 2 costs $275 to build

IHS has told Recode that the Apple iPad Air 2 16GB Wifi costs only $275 to build -- not bad…

More...
LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

LG sells 16.8 million smartphones in Q3 14

As Samsung is losing market share, another Korean company, which many had written off, is gaining.

More...
LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R EU price set at €299

LG G Watch R is probably the best looking Android Wear device on the market and many have been waiting for…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 01 August 2012 08:21

Apple v. Samsung trial kicks off, opening statements delivered

Written by Peter Scott



Easier to copy than to innovate, claims Apple


The Apple v. Samsung patent trial kicked off on Tuesday, with lawyers trading punches and accusations before a federal court in San Jose. In their opening statements, Apple and Samsung laid out basic arguments, clinging to the official line, which is nothing new, as we heard similar arguments in previous trials.

Apple attorney Harold McElhinny told the jury that Samsung chose to copy rather than innovate.

“As we all know it’s easier to copy than to innovate,” he told the court, adding that Samsung copied the entire design and user experience.

McElhinny laid out Apple’s case, claiming that Samsung infringed the touchscreen characteristics of the iPhone after it was released in 2007. He concluded that Samsung smartphones and tablets are nothing more than knockoffs of Apple products.

Samsung responded by downplaying the significance of Apple innovations. Samsung attorney Charles Verhoeven stressed that Samsung employs thousands of engineers and spends billions on research and development.

"Samsung is not some copyist, some Johnny-come-lately doing knockoffs," he said.

Verhoeven argued that other companies and inventors filed patent applications for “rounded rectangles” patented by Apple, saying it is a basic form factor, although he admitted Samsung was inspired by the iPhone. So, it is a bit like Karl Benz patenting the wheel.
 
“Being inspired by a good product and seeking to make even better products is called competition,” Verhoeven said. “It’s not copying and it’s not infringing. Everybody does it in the commercial marketplace.”

More here.

Peter Scott

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments