Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 07 November 2012 10:30

Apple has PR disaster down under

Written by Nick Farrell



Caught out with false promises


Jobs' Mob has missed another opportunity to have a PR victory. A man from New Zealand is challenging Apple over an online deal that he claims the company unfairly backed out on.

On 10 October, Adam Crouchley spotted that some Apple accessories on the company's website had been reduced from as much as $89 to just 83 cents. To make sure there was no error Crouchley used Apple's live chat function to contact customer support, who confirmed that the prices were genuine. He spent  $35 and got about $1600 worth of gear.

After placing his order, Crouchley got a confirmation email saying that some products had already been shipped and others saying that his credit card had been charged for his purchases. However two days later Apple came back and said the order had been cancelled because there was a problem with the price. He was told that Apple would honour the part of the order that had already shipped.

Apple could have just shrugged off the whole thing but instead it  intercepted the courier package instead to make sure the whole order was cancelled. Now Crouchley is taking Apple to the Disputes Tribunal in December in a case that Apple is unlikely to win.  It will also then have to deal with a highly public mess where it clearly turned over one of its own loyal customers.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments