Featured Articles

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel refreshes CPU roadmap

Intel has revealed an update to its CPU roadmap and some things have changed in 2015 and beyond. Let’s start with the…

More...
Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

Hands on: Nvidia Shield Tablet with Android 5.0

We broke the news of Nvidia's ambitious gaming tablet plans back in May and now the Shield tablet got a bit…

More...
Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia N1 Android tablet ships in Q1 2015

Nokia has announced its first Android tablet and when we say Nokia, we don’t mean Microsoft. The Nokia N1 was designed…

More...
Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell launches octa-core 64-bit PXA1936

Marvell is better known for its storage controllers, but the company doesn’t want to give up on the smartphone and…

More...
Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia GTX 970 SLI tested

Nvidia recently released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture, with exceptional performance-per-watt. The Geforce GTX 970…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 07 November 2012 10:30

Apple has PR disaster down under

Written by Nick Farrell



Caught out with false promises


Jobs' Mob has missed another opportunity to have a PR victory. A man from New Zealand is challenging Apple over an online deal that he claims the company unfairly backed out on.

On 10 October, Adam Crouchley spotted that some Apple accessories on the company's website had been reduced from as much as $89 to just 83 cents. To make sure there was no error Crouchley used Apple's live chat function to contact customer support, who confirmed that the prices were genuine. He spent  $35 and got about $1600 worth of gear.

After placing his order, Crouchley got a confirmation email saying that some products had already been shipped and others saying that his credit card had been charged for his purchases. However two days later Apple came back and said the order had been cancelled because there was a problem with the price. He was told that Apple would honour the part of the order that had already shipped.

Apple could have just shrugged off the whole thing but instead it  intercepted the courier package instead to make sure the whole order was cancelled. Now Crouchley is taking Apple to the Disputes Tribunal in December in a case that Apple is unlikely to win.  It will also then have to deal with a highly public mess where it clearly turned over one of its own loyal customers.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments