Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 11 December 2012 10:30

Human brain simulation makes the same mistakes

Written by Nick Farrell



Needs coffee


A huge computer project, which simulates the human brain, is so accurate that it makes the same mistakes.

Boffins working on the SPAUN (Semantic Pointer Architecture Unified Network) project were jolly pleased when the computer simulation COULD play games, make predictions and pass simple IQ tests. But some of the tasks it struggles with are the same sort of things that human brains find trickly.

SPAUN, which has 2.5 million virtual neurons, is the brainchild of Professor Chris Eliasmith, who published his paper in the journal Science in November. He said that the only input to the model is an eye, which gets images like you’d take with a camera and the only output is a simulated arm, which we physically model to have mass, length and inertia. The brain uses the arm to draw its responses.

SPAUN can use this arm to copy numbers and letters that it sees with its eye but it doesn’t just copy the shapes, it understands their value and performs almost as well as a human in handwritten character recognition. But the brain can remember short lists of numbers but, like a human, has trouble when the list gets longer it starts to forget some numbers in the middle as the simulated neuron ‘spikes’ get harder to decode.

Unfortunately they have not worked out how to give the simulated brain a good cup of coffee.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments