Featured Articles

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC: Volume production of 16nm FinFET in 2H 2015

TSMC has announced that it will begin volume production of 16nm FinFET products in the second half of 2015, in late…

More...
AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD misses earnings targets, announces layoffs

AMD has missed earnings targets and is planning a substantial job cuts. The company reported quarterly earnings yesterday and the street is…

More...
Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

Did Google botch the Nexus 6 and Nexus 9?

As expected, Google has finally released the eagerly awaited Nexus 6 phablet and its first 64-bit device, the Nexus 9 tablet.

More...
Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Gainward GTX 970 Phantom previewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Thursday, 17 January 2013 10:53

Plusnet tests sharing IP addresses

Written by Nick Farrell



Big Content will not like this


A UK ISP, PlusNet, is testing a new scheme in which all its customers could share one IP address through Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT). It claims that the move has been made necessary by the slow progress of IPv6, and it could hack off users and big content at the same time.

Firstly it might limit customers’ Internet actions, but on the plus side it will prevent Big Content or law enforcement from tracking users. The situation has come about because IPv4 has run out of addresses and while IPv6 it is being rolled out so slowly that few are using it.

Critics claim PlusNet users cannot host content and it could cause problems with any end-to-end Internet services. However writing in a forum PlusNet’s Matt Taylor defended the decision saying that Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT) is similar to the NAT that people use on their home routers.

Most people they will never notice, most mobile operators already use CGNAT and so most applications will just work.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments