Featured Articles

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

HP Stream is a Chromebook killer priced at $200

We have been hearing reports of a new breed of affordable Windows notebooks for months. It is alleged that a number…

More...
AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD Radeon R7 SSD line-up goes official

AMD has officially launched its first ever SSDs and all three are part of AMD’s AMD Radeon R7 SSD series.

More...
KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

KitKat has more than a fifth of Android users

Android 4.4 is now running on more than a fifth of Android devices, according to Google’s latest figures.

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 17 May 2013 09:13

Newegg routs Alcatel-Lucent troll

Written by Nick Farrell



You shall not pass

Alcatel-Lucent thought that it would take control of the US e-commerce industry with some rather clever trollage. The French telecom had sued eight big retailers and Intuit saying that their e-commerce operations infringed Alcatel patents. It had taken down Kmart, QVC, Lands' End, Intuit, Zappos, Sears, and Amazon also settled. However it appeared to meet its match with Newegg.

The company vowed not to ever settle with patent trolls and forced the case to go to court where Alcatel-Lucent found itself in trouble. Instead of convincing the East Texas jury to hand $12 million from Newegg the company got a verdict of non-infringement. And as for the one patent Alcatel had argued throughout trial was so key to modern e-commerce—US Patent No. 5,649,131 but the jury invalidated its claims.

East Texas was supposed to be a Patent Troll’s heaven as the courts often favour the trolls. Alcatel-Lucent went all-out on appeal and hired Wilmer Hale, the kind of top law firm that handles high-stakes appeals. To make it clear how much they lost by, Federal Circuit judges typically take months, and occasionally years, to review the patent appeals that come before them. The three-judge panel upheld Newegg's win without comment after thinking about it for three days.

Now there is talk about standing up to the trolls in the industry to stop this sort of thing happening.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments