Featured Articles

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD sheds light on stacked DRAM APUs

AMD is fast tracking stacked DRAM deployment and a new presentation leaked by the company  points to APUs with stacked DRAM,…

More...
Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

Nvidia officially launches the 8-inch Shield Tablet

As expected and reported earlier, Nvidia has now officially announced its newest Shield device, the new 8-inch Shield Tablet. While the…

More...
Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel launches new mobile Haswell and Bay Trail parts

Intel has introduced seven new Haswell mobile parts and four Bay Trail SoC chips, but most of them are merely clock…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

AMD A8-7600 Kaveri APU reviewed

Today we'll take a closer look at AMD's A8-7600 APU Kaveri APU, more specifically we'll examine the GPU performance you can…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 04 October 2013 07:41

Ellison backs down in conflict of interest case

Written by Nick Farrell

Not interested in $500 million

Oracle boss Larry Ellison has backed down in a conflict of interest court case over the 2011 acquisition by Oracle of a company he controlled. Ellison has agreed to give up a potential payout of around $500 million to end the case.

The settlement relates to Oracle's purchase of Pillar Data, a data storage company that was majority owned by Ellison. Oracle paid nothing to buy Pillar, instead agreeing to make future payments that would depend on the acquired company's performance through 2014.

Ellison would have received the first $562 million of any payment related to the acquisition. According to the settlement, whatever the payment ultimately is, Ellison must pay 95 percent of it to Oracle. The City of Roseville Employees’ Retirement System and the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority launched the suit. They said the deal to buy Pillar was "tainted by conflicts of interest and was unfair to Oracle."

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments