Featured Articles

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel releases tiny 3G cell modem

Intel has released a 3G cellular modem with an integrated power amplifier that fits into a 300 mm2 footprint, claiming it…

More...
Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

Braswell 14nm Atom slips to Q2 15

It's not all rosy in the house of Intel. It seems that upcoming Atom out-of-order cores might be giving this semiconductor…

More...
TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC 16nm wafers coming in Q1 2015

TSMC will start producing 16nm wafers in the first quarter of 2015. Sometime in the second quarter production should ramp up…

More...
Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S LGA is 35W to 95W TDP part

Skylake-S is the ‘tock’ of the Haswell architecture and despite being delayed from the original plan, this desktop part is scheduled…

More...
Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool Dead Silence reviewed

Aerocool is well known for its gamer cases with aggressive styling. However, the Dead Silence chassis offers consumers a new choice,…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Friday, 04 October 2013 07:41

Ellison backs down in conflict of interest case

Written by Nick Farrell

Not interested in $500 million

Oracle boss Larry Ellison has backed down in a conflict of interest court case over the 2011 acquisition by Oracle of a company he controlled. Ellison has agreed to give up a potential payout of around $500 million to end the case.

The settlement relates to Oracle's purchase of Pillar Data, a data storage company that was majority owned by Ellison. Oracle paid nothing to buy Pillar, instead agreeing to make future payments that would depend on the acquired company's performance through 2014.

Ellison would have received the first $562 million of any payment related to the acquisition. According to the settlement, whatever the payment ultimately is, Ellison must pay 95 percent of it to Oracle. The City of Roseville Employees’ Retirement System and the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority launched the suit. They said the deal to buy Pillar was "tainted by conflicts of interest and was unfair to Oracle."

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments