Featured Articles

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

Analysts expect ARM to do well next year

British chip designer ARM could cash in on the mobile industry's rush to transition to 64-bit operating systems and hardware.

More...
Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Huawei and Xiaomi outpace Lenovo, LG in smartphone market

Samsung has lost smartphone market share, ending the quarter on a low note and Xiaomi appears to be the big winner.

More...
Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

Intel Broadwell 15W coming to CES

It looks like Intel will be showing off its 14nm processors, codenames Broadwell, in a couple of weeks at CES 2015.

More...
Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Gainward GTX 980 Phantom reviewed

Today we’ll be taking a closer look at the recently introduced Gainward GTX 980 4GB with the company’s trademark Phantom cooler.

More...
Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac ZBOX Sphere OI520 barebones vs Sphere Plus review

Zotac has been in the nettop and mini-PC space for more than four years now and it has managed to carve…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Wednesday, 09 October 2013 09:16

Red Cross wants consequences built into computer games

Written by Nick Farrell



Stop rewarding war crimes

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has asked the computer games industry to stop rewarding players who commit online atrocities. According to an ICRC statement developers should consider building “virtual consequences” for war crimes into their video games.

“Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Game scenarios should not reward players for actions that in real life would be considered war crimes.”

 

The ICRC believes that violent video games trivialises armed conflict to the point where players could see various brands of mayhem as acceptable behaviour. But it added that it did not want to be actively involved in a debate over video-game violence, although it is talking to developers about ways to accurately build the laws of armed conflict into games. Violations do occur on real battlefields and can therefore be included in video games. The ICRC believes it is useful for players to learn from rewards and punishments incorporated into the game, about what is acceptable and what is prohibited in war, the ICRC said.

Of course that does not include games that incorporate either fantasy or science-fiction warfare. There were no blue hatted UN soldiers in Lord of the Rings, separating the Orcs from the Men of Gondor. But the ICRC is worried about battlefield simulations such as Call of Duty.

 

Last modified on Wednesday, 09 October 2013 10:05

Related Video

blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments