Featured Articles

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia Shield 2 shows up in AnTuTu

Nvidia’s original Shield console launched last summer to mixed reviews. It went on sale in the US and so far Nvidia…

More...
AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

AMD CSO John Byrne talks ARM

We had a chance to talk about AMD’s upcoming products with John Byrne, Chief Sales Officer, AMD. We covered a number…

More...
AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

AMD Chief Sales Officer thinks GPU leadership is critical

We had a chance to talk to John Byrne who spent the last two years as Senior Vice President and Chief…

More...
OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OpenPlus One $299 5.5-inch Full HD phone

OnePlus is one of the few small companies that might disrupt the Android phone market, dominated by giant outfits like Samsung.…

More...
KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 GTX 780 Ti Hall Of Fame reviewed

KFA2 gained a lot of overclocking experience with the GTX 780 Hall of Fame (HOF), which we had a chance to…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Tuesday, 29 October 2013 12:20

Security firms come up with novel troll defence

Written by Nick Farrell



How can a patent be worth that much

Two security firms, who are being attacked by a patent troll, are using a new form of defence which could totally stuff up the entire patent troll business, if they pull it off.

Symantec and Trend Micro are defending against an allegation from Intellectual Ventures that they owe it $310 million combined for a license to one of its patents. The pair are using a novel legal theory which points out that Intellectual Ventures only paid $750,000 for the patent and it could not possibly be worth as much as $310 million.

They are also using the traditional arguments that Symantec and Trend Micro do not violate IV's patents in the first place, but the “it is not worth it” defence could seriously scuttle the patent troll business, if it is accepted. If the royalty is capped at the purchase price, there's obviously no point in being a patent troll as you can’t really charge more for the licence than you paid for it. In this case the most that it could collect from the security companies is $750,000 each.

Symantec and Trend Micro lawyers argued that the law prohibits IV from calculating a high royalty. A patent license is, by definition, less valuable than outright ownership of a patent, Symantec and Trend Micro lawyers pointed out.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

To be able to post comments please log-in with Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments