Featured Articles

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

Snapdragon 400 is Qualcomm’s SoC for watches, wearables

We wanted to learn a bit more about Qualcomm's plans for wearables and it turns out that the company believes its…

More...
Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

Qualcomm sampling 20nm Snapdragon 810

We had a chance to talk to Michelle Leyden-Li, Senior Director of Marketing, QCT at Qualcomm and get an update on…

More...
EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia GTX 980 reviewed

Nvidia has released two new graphics cards based on its latest Maxwell GPU architecture. The Geforce GTX 970 and Geforce GTX…

More...
PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

PowerColor TurboDuo R9 285 reviewed

Today we will take a look at the PowerColor TurboDuo Radeon R9 285. The card is based on AMD’s new…

More...
Frontpage Slideshow | Copyright © 2006-2010 orks, a business unit of Nuevvo Webware Ltd.
Monday, 31 March 2014 11:26

Now everyone can sue Apple

Written by Nick Farrell



Ebook price cartel

A US judge has granted a group of consumers who were shafted by Steve Jobs’ attempts to screw money out of them by setting up a cartel the right to sue Apple in a class action.

While the publishers have admitted taking part in the cartel, Apple has always denied it. So far all the law suits have come from the Justice Department and state regulators, now a Federal Judge has given a group of ordinary people a chance to sue Apple.

U.S. District Judge Denise Cote said the plaintiffs had "more than met their burden" to allow them to sue as a Apple and the publishers in the cartel. She rejected Apple's contentions that the claims were too different from each other, or that some plaintiffs were not harmed because some e-book prices fell.

She said that this was a “paradigmatic antitrust class action," wrote Cote. If they win then damages could reach hundreds of millions of dollars. In July 2013, Cote found the technology company liable for colluding with the publishers after a separate non-jury trial in a case brought by the US Department of Justice. Cote found that Apple took part in a price-fixing conspiracy to fight online retailer Amazon.com dominance in the e-book market.

Apple is appealing that ruling. It is having difficulty with the concept that Steve Jobs might have done something so completely evil to consumers when it says on their press release that Apple loves its customers.

Nick Farrell

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
blog comments powered by Disqus

 

Facebook activity

Latest Commented Articles

Recent Comments